GACA.DE vs. 2B7K.DE
GACA.DE (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.)) and 2B7K.DE (iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - GACA.DE tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity while 2B7K.DE tracks the MSCI World SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GACA.DE returned 13.63%/yr vs 10.50%/yr for 2B7K.DE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GACA.DE charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for 2B7K.DE.
Performance
GACA.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GACA.DE having a 10.44% return and 2B7K.DE slightly higher at 10.83%.
GACA.DE
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 5.10%
- YTD
- 10.44%
- 6M
- 10.26%
- 1Y
- 20.78%
- 3Y*
- 17.51%
- 5Y*
- 13.63%
- 10Y*
- —
2B7K.DE
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.92%
- YTD
- 10.83%
- 6M
- 11.24%
- 1Y
- 18.74%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.50%
- 10Y*
- —
GACA.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GACA.DE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) | 10.44% | 3.94% | 29.59% | 21.02% | -14.66% | 38.66% | 7.33% | 8.54% |
2B7K.DE iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 10.83% | 2.85% | 17.54% | 20.90% | -16.94% | 36.69% | 9.65% | 9.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between GACA.DE and 2B7K.DE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2019 | 0.92 |
The correlation between GACA.DE and 2B7K.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GACA.DE vs. 2B7K.DE — Risk / Return Rank
GACA.DE
2B7K.DE
GACA.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GACA.DE) and iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (2B7K.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GACA.DE | 2B7K.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.27 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 2.37 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.09 | 8.64 | -0.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GACA.DE | 2B7K.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 1.48 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.71 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.79 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
GACA.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GACA.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.50%, which is greater than 2B7K.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GACA.DE and 2B7K.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GACA.DE | 2B7K.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.50% | -31.65% | -1.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.95% | -7.81% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.68% | -21.29% | -2.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.68% | -21.29% | -2.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | 0.00% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.08% | -5.16% | +0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 2.15% | +0.42% |
Volatility
GACA.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GACA.DE) is 3.46%, while iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (2B7K.DE) has a volatility of 3.69%. This indicates that GACA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2B7K.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GACA.DE | 2B7K.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | 3.69% | -0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.82% | 9.21% | -0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.00% | 12.48% | +0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 14.60% | +0.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.22% | 16.18% | +1.04% |
GACA.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GACA.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than 2B7K.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GACA.DE vs. 2B7K.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither GACA.DE nor 2B7K.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GACA.DE and 2B7K.DE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GACA.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GACA.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for 2B7K.DE.
GACA.DE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity, while 2B7K.DE tracks MSCI World SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GACA.DE and 0.20% for 2B7K.DE.
Find the right allocation for GACA.DE and 2B7K.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer