PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GABSX vs. FTHNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GABSX vs. FTHNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund (GABSX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund (FTHNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GABSX achieves a 15.80% return, which is significantly lower than FTHNX's 18.31% return. Over the past 10 years, GABSX has underperformed FTHNX with an annualized return of 10.68%, while FTHNX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.88% annualized return.


GABSX

1D
1.65%
1M
1.57%
6M
8.75%
YTD
15.80%
1Y
22.76%
3Y*
13.51%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
10.68%
ALL TIME*
11.31%

FTHNX

1D
1.27%
1M
3.14%
6M
12.68%
YTD
18.31%
1Y
28.26%
3Y*
18.79%
5Y*
12.99%
10Y*
13.88%
ALL TIME*
13.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GABSX vs. FTHNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GABSX
Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund
15.80%8.65%10.22%21.45%-12.63%24.82%13.63%21.56%-15.25%19.05%
FTHNX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund
18.31%11.69%15.81%22.18%-7.73%30.44%10.05%27.74%-13.45%17.25%

Correlation

The correlation between GABSX and FTHNX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2015

0.94

The correlation between GABSX and FTHNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GABSX vs. FTHNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GABSX
GABSX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GABSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GABSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
GABSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
GABSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
GABSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FTHNX
FTHNX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FTHNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTHNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTHNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FTHNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTHNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GABSX vs. FTHNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund (GABSX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund (FTHNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GABSXFTHNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.36

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

3.21

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.02

11.54

-4.52

GABSX vs. FTHNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GABSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the FTHNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GABSX and FTHNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GABSX vs. FTHNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GABSX drawdown since its inception was -57.24%, which is greater than FTHNX's maximum drawdown of -37.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABSX and FTHNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GABSXFTHNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.24%

-37.78%

-19.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.45%

-9.44%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.43%

-24.63%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.19%

-24.63%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.74%

-37.78%

-2.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

0.00%

-0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.95%

-5.62%

-1.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

2.62%

+0.86%

Volatility

GABSX vs. FTHNX - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund (GABSX) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund (FTHNX) at 3.56%. This indicates that GABSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTHNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GABSXFTHNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

3.56%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.61%

10.80%

+1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.81%

14.89%

+1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.10%

18.79%

+0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.99%

20.07%

-0.08%

GABSX vs. FTHNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GABSX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FTHNX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

GABSX vs. FTHNX - Dividend Comparison

GABSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, more than FTHNX's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTHNX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund
0.24%0.28%7.84%1.60%0.95%3.55%0.11%0.11%0.21%0.09%0.00%15.47%
GABSX
Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund
3.44%3.98%6.61%8.68%9.53%13.50%22.21%21.36%4.70%5.38%3.87%3.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


GABSX and FTHNX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GABSX has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to FTHNX (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GABSX dropped -57.24% vs FTHNX's -37.78%.

FTHNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GABSX and FTHNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer