GABSX vs. RFV

In the year-to-date period, GABSX achieves a -7.83% return, which is significantly higher than RFV's -8.87% return. Over the past 10 years, GABSX has underperformed RFV with an annualized return of -2.29%, while RFV has yielded a comparatively higher 8.74% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

GABSX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than RFV's 0.35% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund (GABSX) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GABSX Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the RFV Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GABSX and RFV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

GABSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than RFV's 1.72% yield.

The maximum GABSX drawdown since its inception was -57.24%, smaller than the maximum RFV drawdown of -71.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABSX and RFV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund (GABSX) is 12.94%, while Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) has a volatility of 16.36%. This indicates that GABSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.