GABSX vs. RFV
Compare and contrast key facts about Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund (GABSX) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV).
GABSX is managed by Gabelli. It was launched on Oct 22, 1991. RFV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GABSX or RFV.
Key characteristics
| GABSX | RFV | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 9.83% | 0.25% |
| 1Y Return | 22.31% | 17.32% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.89% | 10.26% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.78% | 15.08% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.99% | 9.80% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.26 | 0.89 |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.45% | 20.02% |
| Max Drawdown | -51.67% | -71.82% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.63% | -3.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between GABSX and RFV is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GABSX vs. RFV - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GABSX achieves a 9.83% return, which is significantly higher than RFV's 0.25% return. Over the past 10 years, GABSX has underperformed RFV with an annualized return of 8.99%, while RFV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.80% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GABSX vs. RFV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GABSX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than RFV's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GABSX vs. RFV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund (GABSX) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GABSX vs. RFV - Dividend Comparison
GABSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.91%, more than RFV's 0.94% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABSX Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund | 7.91% | 8.68% | 9.53% | 13.50% | 22.21% | 21.36% | 4.70% | 5.38% | 3.87% | 3.78% | 1.87% | 2.94% |
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 0.94% | 1.27% | 2.05% | 1.60% | 1.52% | 1.71% | 1.39% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 1.79% | 1.19% | 0.80% |
Drawdowns
GABSX vs. RFV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GABSX drawdown since its inception was -51.67%, smaller than the maximum RFV drawdown of -71.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABSX and RFV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GABSX vs. RFV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund (GABSX) is 5.35%, while Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that GABSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.