GABSX vs. RFV
Compare and contrast key facts about Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund (GABSX) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV).
GABSX is managed by Gabelli. It was launched on Oct 22, 1991. RFV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006.
Performance
GABSX vs. RFV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GABSX vs. RFV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABSX Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund | 2.01% | 8.65% | 10.22% | 21.45% | -12.63% | 24.82% | 13.63% | 21.56% | -15.25% | 19.05% |
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 2.80% | 7.66% | 5.63% | 30.26% | -3.99% | 33.02% | 9.61% | 24.98% | -18.56% | 14.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GABSX achieves a 2.01% return, which is significantly lower than RFV's 2.80% return. Over the past 10 years, GABSX has underperformed RFV with an annualized return of 9.96%, while RFV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.71% annualized return.
GABSX
- 1D
- 2.40%
- 1M
- -7.47%
- YTD
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 3.50%
- 1Y
- 16.58%
- 3Y*
- 11.98%
- 5Y*
- 7.40%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
RFV
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -2.93%
- YTD
- 2.80%
- 6M
- 2.26%
- 1Y
- 16.75%
- 3Y*
- 13.41%
- 5Y*
- 9.50%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GABSX vs. RFV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GABSX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than RFV's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GABSX vs. RFV — Risk / Return Rank
GABSX
RFV
GABSX vs. RFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund (GABSX) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GABSX | RFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 0.69 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.36 | 1.16 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.15 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 1.09 | +0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.48 | 3.52 | +0.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GABSX | RFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 0.69 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.43 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.47 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.36 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between GABSX and RFV is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GABSX vs. RFV - Dividend Comparison
GABSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than RFV's 2.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABSX Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund | 3.90% | 3.98% | 6.61% | 8.68% | 9.53% | 13.50% | 22.21% | 21.36% | 4.70% | 5.38% | 3.87% | 3.78% |
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 2.03% | 2.07% | 1.31% | 1.27% | 2.05% | 1.60% | 1.52% | 1.71% | 1.39% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 1.79% |
Drawdowns
GABSX vs. RFV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GABSX drawdown since its inception was -57.24%, smaller than the maximum RFV drawdown of -71.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABSX and RFV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GABSX | RFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.24% | -71.82% | +14.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.07% | -15.62% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.19% | -24.65% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.74% | -52.24% | +11.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.66% | -7.98% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.00% | -9.85% | +2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.86% | 4.81% | -0.95% |
Volatility
GABSX vs. RFV - Volatility Comparison
Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund (GABSX) has a higher volatility of 6.21% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) at 5.12%. This indicates that GABSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GABSX | RFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.21% | 5.12% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.55% | 13.17% | -1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.29% | 24.40% | -4.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.00% | 22.22% | -3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.91% | 25.04% | -5.13% |