GABF vs. RSPU
GABF (Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF) and RSPU (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GABF is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli, while RSPU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Utilities Plus. GABF is actively managed, while RSPU is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GABF returned 20.47%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for RSPU. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GABF charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPU.
Performance
GABF vs. RSPU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GABF achieves a -7.03% return, which is significantly lower than RSPU's 4.83% return.
GABF
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- -3.11%
- YTD
- -7.03%
- 6M
- -6.24%
- 1Y
- -3.20%
- 3Y*
- 20.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPU
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -4.29%
- YTD
- 4.83%
- 6M
- 3.78%
- 1Y
- 10.96%
- 3Y*
- 15.70%
- 5Y*
- 10.71%
- 10Y*
- 9.39%
GABF vs. RSPU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | -7.03% | 3.60% | 44.38% | 38.92% | 0.40% |
RSPU Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF | 4.83% | 16.82% | 23.57% | -3.45% | 1.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between GABF and RSPU is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2022 | 0.39 |
The correlation between GABF and RSPU shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GABF vs. RSPU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GABF
RSPU
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
GABF
RSPU
-
Real Estate
GABF
RSPU
-
Technology
GABF
RSPU
-
Industrials
GABF
RSPU
-
Basic Materials
GABF
-
RSPU
-
Communication Services
GABF
-
RSPU
-
Consumer Cyclical
GABF
-
RSPU
-
Consumer Defensive
GABF
-
RSPU
-
Energy
GABF
-
RSPU
-
Healthcare
GABF
-
RSPU
-
Utilities
GABF
-
RSPU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GABF vs. RSPU — Risk / Return Rank
GABF
RSPU
GABF vs. RSPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GABF | RSPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.14 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 1.30 | -1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.44 | 3.04 | -3.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GABF | RSPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 | 0.79 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.47 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
GABF vs. RSPU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GABF drawdown since its inception was -20.86%, smaller than the maximum RSPU drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABF and RSPU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GABF | RSPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.86% | -48.08% | +27.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.16% | -8.46% | -8.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.86% | -16.27% | -4.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.60% | -7.15% | -4.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.86% | -7.85% | +2.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.27% | 3.63% | +3.64% |
Volatility
GABF vs. RSPU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) is 4.28%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that GABF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GABF | RSPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.28% | 5.21% | -0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.14% | 10.93% | +2.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.37% | 13.98% | +3.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.54% | 16.92% | +3.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.54% | 19.09% | +1.45% |
GABF vs. RSPU - Expense Ratio Comparison
GABF has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPU's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
GABF vs. RSPU - Dividend Comparison
GABF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than RSPU's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | 2.11% | 1.96% | 4.19% | 4.95% | 1.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPU Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF | 2.54% | 2.54% | 2.39% | 2.92% | 2.35% | 2.41% | 2.94% | 2.54% | 3.11% | 3.08% | 2.98% | 4.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GABF and RSPU have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSPU has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to GABF (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GABF dropped -20.86% vs RSPU's -48.08%.
On 3-year performance, GABF leads with 20.47% vs 15.70% for RSPU. On fees, GABF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GABF has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GABF has performed better with a 20.47% return vs 15.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GABF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPU.
RSPU has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 2.11% for GABF.
GABF is categorized as Financials Equities, while RSPU is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: Gabelli and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GABF and 0.40% for RSPU.
RSPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GABF and RSPU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer