PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GABEX vs. LCCMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GABEX vs. LCCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Equity Income Fund (GABEX) and Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GABEX achieves a 6.29% return, which is significantly higher than LCCMX's 3.89% return. Over the past 10 years, GABEX has outperformed LCCMX with an annualized return of 11.63%, while LCCMX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.26% annualized return.


GABEX

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
6.29%
6M
7.87%
1Y
5.58%
3Y*
8.35%
5Y*
4.65%
10Y*
11.63%

LCCMX

1D
0.12%
1M
1.19%
YTD
3.89%
6M
6.33%
1Y
11.06%
3Y*
14.65%
5Y*
6.06%
10Y*
4.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GABEX vs. LCCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GABEX
Gabelli Equity Income Fund
6.29%4.33%6.62%8.25%-5.22%23.28%7.54%75.11%-11.37%15.16%
LCCMX
Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund
3.89%9.73%18.51%13.73%-13.30%1.30%7.52%0.65%2.35%1.89%

Correlation

The correlation between GABEX and LCCMX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2005

0.23

The correlation between GABEX and LCCMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (3 years) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GABEX vs. LCCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GABEX
GABEX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
GABEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GABEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
GABEX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
GABEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
GABEX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

LCCMX
LCCMX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
LCCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
LCCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GABEX vs. LCCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Equity Income Fund (GABEX) and Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GABEXLCCMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.37

2.51

-2.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.55

5.49

-4.94

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

2.03

-0.94

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

3.26

-2.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.04

11.51

-10.47

GABEX vs. LCCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GABEX Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the LCCMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GABEX and LCCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GABEXLCCMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

2.51

-2.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

1.04

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.67

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.81

-0.21

Drawdowns

GABEX vs. LCCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GABEX drawdown since its inception was -52.25%, which is greater than LCCMX's maximum drawdown of -24.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABEX and LCCMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GABEXLCCMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.25%

-24.57%

-27.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.11%

-3.76%

-9.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.75%

-3.76%

-10.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.59%

-19.20%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.27%

-24.57%

-12.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.81%

0.00%

-3.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-2.80%

-2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.07%

1.06%

+5.01%

Volatility

GABEX vs. LCCMX - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli Equity Income Fund (GABEX) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX) at 0.68%. This indicates that GABEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GABEXLCCMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

0.68%

+2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.02%

4.12%

+4.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.04%

4.54%

+10.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.24%

5.84%

+9.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.33%

6.35%

+14.98%

GABEX vs. LCCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GABEX has a 1.42% expense ratio, which is lower than LCCMX's 2.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

GABEX vs. LCCMX - Dividend Comparison

GABEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.53%, more than LCCMX's 8.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GABEX
Gabelli Equity Income Fund
21.53%20.83%33.06%23.48%20.49%19.96%32.82%65.43%31.87%17.83%16.63%7.78%
LCCMX
Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund
8.53%8.93%10.39%8.55%5.68%2.11%2.11%2.98%2.89%2.10%2.01%2.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


GABEX and LCCMX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GABEX has higher volatility (3.27%) compared to LCCMX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GABEX dropped -52.25% vs LCCMX's -24.57%.

LCCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GABEX and LCCMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer