PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GABBX vs. GDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GABBX vs. GDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund (GABBX) and The GDL Fund (GDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GABBX achieves a 7.36% return, which is significantly higher than GDL's 1.33% return. Over the past 10 years, GABBX has outperformed GDL with an annualized return of 8.92%, while GDL has yielded a comparatively lower 3.93% annualized return.


GABBX

1D
0.48%
1M
0.90%
YTD
7.36%
6M
9.54%
1Y
22.79%
3Y*
13.73%
5Y*
6.40%
10Y*
8.92%

GDL

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
1.33%
6M
2.77%
1Y
8.31%
3Y*
8.45%
5Y*
4.69%
10Y*
3.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GABBX vs. GDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GABBX
Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund
7.36%17.41%10.13%7.61%-9.62%20.18%5.09%26.43%-10.90%12.10%
GDL
The GDL Fund
1.33%11.83%5.94%9.02%-6.88%8.04%-0.99%5.87%-1.60%4.74%

Correlation

The correlation between GABBX and GDL is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2007

0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between GABBX and GDL has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GABBX vs. GDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GABBX
GABBX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
GABBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GABBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
GABBX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GABBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
GABBX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

GDL
GDL Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
GDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDL Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
GDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDL Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GABBX vs. GDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund (GABBX) and The GDL Fund (GDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GABBXGDLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.05

1.15

+0.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.97

1.63

+1.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.20

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

2.15

+1.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.18

6.79

+4.39

GABBX vs. GDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GABBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the GDL Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GABBX and GDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GABBXGDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

1.15

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.54

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.30

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.23

+0.10

Drawdowns

GABBX vs. GDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GABBX drawdown since its inception was -60.85%, which is greater than GDL's maximum drawdown of -38.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABBX and GDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GABBXGDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.85%

-38.74%

-22.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.35%

-3.21%

-4.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.01%

-6.00%

-9.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.42%

-9.48%

-11.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.64%

-38.74%

+0.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-0.65%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.14%

-4.93%

-6.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

1.01%

+1.12%

Volatility

GABBX vs. GDL - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund (GABBX) has a higher volatility of 2.60% compared to The GDL Fund (GDL) at 1.55%. This indicates that GABBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GABBXGDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

1.55%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.35%

5.27%

+3.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.68%

7.38%

+4.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.54%

8.64%

+5.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.34%

12.97%

+4.37%

GABBX vs. GDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GABBX has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GDL's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

GABBX vs. GDL - Dividend Comparison

GABBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.75%, more than GDL's 5.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GABBX
Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund
11.75%12.62%12.57%1.43%1.71%11.25%2.90%4.42%11.77%16.73%5.97%3.35%
GDL
The GDL Fund
5.67%5.67%5.99%5.97%6.12%5.38%5.28%4.30%4.36%5.96%6.50%6.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


GABBX and GDL have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GABBX has higher volatility (2.60%) compared to GDL (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GABBX dropped -60.85% vs GDL's -38.74%.

GABBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GABBX and GDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer