PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GABBX vs. NANC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GABBX vs. NANC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund (GABBX) and Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GABBX achieves a 10.19% return, which is significantly higher than NANC's 9.12% return.


GABBX

1D
0.52%
1M
0.83%
6M
6.16%
YTD
10.19%
1Y
21.75%
3Y*
12.56%
5Y*
7.15%
10Y*
8.95%
ALL TIME*
6.67%

NANC

1D
1.18%
1M
-0.64%
6M
8.71%
YTD
9.12%
1Y
19.87%
3Y*
20.55%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$826.89K$806.25K$1.03M

GABBX vs. NANC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GABBX
Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund
10.19%17.41%10.13%1.97%
NANC
Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF
9.12%18.54%26.83%22.81%

Correlation

The correlation between GABBX and NANC is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2023

0.67

The correlation between GABBX and NANC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GABBX vs. NANC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GABBX
GABBX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
GABBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GABBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
GABBX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GABBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
GABBX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

NANC
NANC Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
NANC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NANC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
NANC Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
NANC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
NANC Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GABBX vs. NANC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund (GABBX) and Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GABBXNANCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.21

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

1.47

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.33

5.80

+3.54

GABBX vs. NANC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GABBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the NANC Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GABBX and NANC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GABBX vs. NANC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GABBX drawdown since its inception was -60.85%, which is greater than NANC's maximum drawdown of -20.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABBX and NANC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GABBXNANCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.85%

-20.94%

-39.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.35%

-12.21%

+4.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.01%

-20.94%

+5.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-1.72%

+1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.08%

-2.64%

-8.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

3.09%

-1.10%

Volatility

GABBX vs. NANC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund (GABBX) is 3.15%, while Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that GABBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NANC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GABBXNANCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

4.54%

-1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.42%

11.90%

-3.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.78%

14.96%

-3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.55%

16.81%

-2.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.25%

16.81%

+0.44%

GABBX vs. NANC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GABBX has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than NANC's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

GABBX vs. NANC - Dividend Comparison

GABBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.45%, more than NANC's 0.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GABBX
Gabelli Dividend Growth Fund
11.45%12.62%12.57%1.43%1.71%11.25%2.90%4.42%11.77%16.73%5.97%3.35%
NANC
Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF
0.19%0.21%0.20%0.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GABBX and NANC have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NANC has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to GABBX (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GABBX dropped -60.85% vs NANC's -20.94%.

GABBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GABBX and NANC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer