PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDL vs. GABTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDL vs. GABTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The GDL Fund (GDL) and Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund (GABTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDL achieves a 2.66% return, which is significantly lower than GABTX's 12.37% return. Over the past 10 years, GDL has underperformed GABTX with an annualized return of 3.99%, while GABTX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.55% annualized return.


GDL

1D
0.48%
1M
1.32%
YTD
2.66%
6M
2.90%
1Y
7.37%
3Y*
9.07%
5Y*
4.57%
10Y*
3.99%

GABTX

1D
-1.17%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
12.37%
6M
12.96%
1Y
31.84%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
7.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDL vs. GABTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GDL
The GDL Fund
2.66%11.83%5.94%9.02%-6.88%8.04%-0.99%5.87%-1.60%4.74%
GABTX
Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund
12.37%27.50%14.94%22.81%-28.59%5.15%16.44%15.63%-11.90%13.37%

Correlation

The correlation between GDL and GABTX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2007

0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between GDL and GABTX has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDL vs. GABTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDL
GDL Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
GDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDL Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
GDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDL Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

GABTX
GABTX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GABTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GABTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GABTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
GABTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
GABTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDL vs. GABTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The GDL Fund (GDL) and Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund (GABTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDLGABTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.40

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

3.72

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.21

9.15

-1.94

GDL vs. GABTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDL Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the GABTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDL and GABTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GDL vs. GABTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDL drawdown since its inception was -38.74%, smaller than the maximum GABTX drawdown of -69.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDL and GABTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDLGABTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.74%

-69.14%

+30.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.21%

-9.11%

+5.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.00%

-15.69%

+9.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.48%

-39.83%

+30.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.74%

-39.83%

+1.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.12%

+6.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.91%

-16.55%

+11.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

3.70%

-2.68%

Volatility

GDL vs. GABTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The GDL Fund (GDL) is 1.42%, while Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund (GABTX) has a volatility of 6.21%. This indicates that GDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GABTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDLGABTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

6.21%

-4.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.98%

11.37%

-6.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.16%

14.64%

-7.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.63%

16.54%

-7.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.97%

16.45%

-3.48%

GDL vs. GABTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDL has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than GABTX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDL vs. GABTX - Dividend Comparison

GDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, less than GABTX's 15.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GABTX
Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund
15.90%17.87%0.00%0.32%2.28%6.72%3.08%6.45%6.03%6.41%7.02%8.31%
GDL
The GDL Fund
5.68%5.67%5.99%5.97%6.12%5.38%5.28%4.30%4.36%5.96%6.50%6.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDL and GABTX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GABTX has higher volatility (6.21%) compared to GDL (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDL dropped -38.74% vs GABTX's -69.14%.

GABTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDL and GABTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer