PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAAEX vs. GQRPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAAEX vs. GQRPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund (GAAEX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund (GQRPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAAEX achieves a 19.37% return, which is significantly higher than GQRPX's 6.39% return.


GAAEX

1D
-0.52%
1M
5.57%
YTD
19.37%
6M
18.26%
1Y
41.34%
3Y*
6.62%
5Y*
3.98%
10Y*
10.98%

GQRPX

1D
-1.12%
1M
-1.70%
YTD
6.39%
6M
7.28%
1Y
7.34%
3Y*
13.57%
5Y*
9.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAAEX vs. GQRPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GAAEX
Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund
19.37%26.64%-11.85%-2.39%-12.67%8.40%86.45%14.48%
GQRPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund
6.39%0.67%19.98%19.56%-3.77%16.94%14.55%12.70%

Correlation

The correlation between GAAEX and GQRPX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2019

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between GAAEX and GQRPX has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAAEX vs. GQRPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAAEX
GAAEX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
GAAEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAAEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAAEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
GAAEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAAEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

GQRPX
GQRPX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
GQRPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQRPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQRPX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
GQRPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQRPX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAAEX vs. GQRPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund (GAAEX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund (GQRPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GAAEXGQRPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.13

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

1.23

+1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.44

2.54

+7.89

GAAEX vs. GQRPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAAEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the GQRPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAAEX and GQRPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GAAEXGQRPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

0.73

+1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.63

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

0.69

-0.75

Drawdowns

GAAEX vs. GQRPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAAEX drawdown since its inception was -85.83%, which is greater than GQRPX's maximum drawdown of -28.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAAEX and GQRPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAAEXGQRPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.83%

-28.88%

-56.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.57%

-5.37%

-9.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.21%

-16.49%

-18.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.64%

-20.39%

-20.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.08%

-4.60%

-44.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.64%

-4.96%

-58.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

2.60%

+1.50%

Volatility

GAAEX vs. GQRPX - Volatility Comparison

Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund (GAAEX) has a higher volatility of 7.58% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund (GQRPX) at 2.90%. This indicates that GAAEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQRPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAAEXGQRPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.58%

2.90%

+4.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.12%

6.97%

+8.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.45%

9.09%

+10.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.46%

14.70%

+7.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.38%

17.27%

+5.11%

GAAEX vs. GQRPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAAEX has a 1.98% expense ratio, which is higher than GQRPX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

GAAEX vs. GQRPX - Dividend Comparison

GAAEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than GQRPX's 7.14% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GAAEX
Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund
0.27%0.33%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.09%0.28%
GQRPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund
7.14%7.60%6.35%1.22%2.93%1.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GAAEX and GQRPX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GAAEX has higher volatility (7.58%) compared to GQRPX (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAAEX dropped -85.83% vs GQRPX's -28.88%.

GAAEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAAEX and GQRPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer