GAA vs. TAIL
GAA (Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF) and TAIL (Cambria Tail Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GAA is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Cambria, while TAIL is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund actively managed by Cambria. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GAA returned 6.12%/yr vs -8.23%/yr for TAIL. At a correlation of -0.35, they often move in opposite directions. GAA charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for TAIL.
Performance
GAA vs. TAIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAA achieves a 6.98% return, which is significantly higher than TAIL's -5.49% return.
GAA
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- 6.98%
- 6M
- 7.10%
- 1Y
- 17.83%
- 3Y*
- 13.29%
- 5Y*
- 6.12%
- 10Y*
- 7.57%
TAIL
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- -5.49%
- 6M
- -5.16%
- 1Y
- -8.67%
- 3Y*
- -5.25%
- 5Y*
- -8.23%
- 10Y*
- —
GAA vs. TAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF | 6.98% | 18.76% | 6.67% | 7.65% | -8.47% | 11.17% | 9.11% | 15.12% | -7.15% | 8.01% |
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF | -5.49% | 5.48% | -9.62% | -13.29% | -13.13% | -12.81% | 6.91% | -14.27% | 2.85% | -7.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAA and TAIL is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2017 | -0.35 |
The correlation between GAA and TAIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.35 (all time) to -0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAA vs. TAIL — Risk / Return Rank
GAA
TAIL
GAA vs. TAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GAA | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 0.83 | +0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | -0.78 | +3.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.58 | -1.77 | +13.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GAA vs. TAIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAA drawdown since its inception was -26.57%, smaller than the maximum TAIL drawdown of -52.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAA and TAIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAA | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.57% | -52.36% | +25.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.78% | -11.10% | +5.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.18% | -20.78% | +13.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.47% | -38.44% | +19.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -51.20% | +48.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.84% | -29.23% | +25.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.54% | 4.94% | -3.40% |
Volatility
GAA vs. TAIL - Volatility Comparison
Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) at 1.90%. This indicates that GAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAA | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 1.90% | +2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.16% | 6.64% | +1.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.56% | 8.48% | +1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.37% | 14.90% | -3.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.12% | 14.91% | -3.79% |
GAA vs. TAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAA has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than TAIL's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
GAA vs. TAIL - Dividend Comparison
GAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than TAIL's 2.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF | 3.67% | 4.24% | 3.88% | 3.73% | 6.05% | 4.21% | 2.73% | 3.32% | 3.01% | 2.36% | 2.82% | 2.49% |
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF | 2.90% | 2.88% | 3.48% | 3.74% | 1.50% | 0.49% | 0.36% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GAA and TAIL have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GAA has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to TAIL (1.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAA dropped -26.57% vs TAIL's -52.36%.
On 5-year performance, GAA leads with 6.12% vs -8.23% for TAIL. On fees, GAA is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, TAIL has been the lower-risk option at 1.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GAA has performed better with a 6.12% return vs -8.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GAA is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TAIL.
GAA has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 2.90% for TAIL.
GAA is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while TAIL is Volatility Hedged Equity. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for GAA and 0.59% for TAIL.
GAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GAA and TAIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer