PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAA vs. TAIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAA vs. TAIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAA achieves a 6.98% return, which is significantly higher than TAIL's -5.49% return.


GAA

1D
-2.33%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
6.98%
6M
7.10%
1Y
17.83%
3Y*
13.29%
5Y*
6.12%
10Y*
7.57%

TAIL

1D
1.03%
1M
0.87%
YTD
-5.49%
6M
-5.16%
1Y
-8.67%
3Y*
-5.25%
5Y*
-8.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAA vs. TAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GAA
Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF
6.98%18.76%6.67%7.65%-8.47%11.17%9.11%15.12%-7.15%8.01%
TAIL
Cambria Tail Risk ETF
-5.49%5.48%-9.62%-13.29%-13.13%-12.81%6.91%-14.27%2.85%-7.55%

Correlation

The correlation between GAA and TAIL is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2017

-0.35

The correlation between GAA and TAIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.35 (all time) to -0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAA vs. TAIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAA
GAA Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
GAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAA Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
GAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAA Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

TAIL
TAIL Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
TAIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAIL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
TAIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAIL Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAA vs. TAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GAATAILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

0.83

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

-0.78

+3.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.58

-1.77

+13.34

GAA vs. TAIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAA Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the TAIL Sharpe Ratio of -1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAA and TAIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GAA vs. TAIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAA drawdown since its inception was -26.57%, smaller than the maximum TAIL drawdown of -52.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAA and TAIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAATAILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.57%

-52.36%

+25.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.78%

-11.10%

+5.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.18%

-20.78%

+13.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.47%

-38.44%

+19.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.85%

-51.20%

+48.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-29.23%

+25.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

4.94%

-3.40%

Volatility

GAA vs. TAIL - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) at 1.90%. This indicates that GAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAATAILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

1.90%

+2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

6.64%

+1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.56%

8.48%

+1.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.37%

14.90%

-3.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.12%

14.91%

-3.79%

GAA vs. TAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAA has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than TAIL's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

GAA vs. TAIL - Dividend Comparison

GAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than TAIL's 2.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GAA
Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF
3.67%4.24%3.88%3.73%6.05%4.21%2.73%3.32%3.01%2.36%2.82%2.49%
TAIL
Cambria Tail Risk ETF
2.90%2.88%3.48%3.74%1.50%0.49%0.36%1.58%1.52%0.91%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GAA and TAIL have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GAA has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to TAIL (1.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAA dropped -26.57% vs TAIL's -52.36%.

On 5-year performance, GAA leads with 6.12% vs -8.23% for TAIL. On fees, GAA is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, TAIL has been the lower-risk option at 1.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GAA has performed better with a 6.12% return vs -8.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GAA is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TAIL.

GAA has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 2.90% for TAIL.

GAA is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while TAIL is Volatility Hedged Equity. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for GAA and 0.59% for TAIL.

GAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAA and TAIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer