PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAA vs. ASET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAA vs. ASET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GAA

1D
-0.66%
1M
1.35%
YTD
9.39%
6M
11.23%
1Y
22.62%
3Y*
14.43%
5Y*
6.37%
10Y*
7.72%

ASET

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAA vs. ASET - Yearly Performance Comparison


GAA vs. ASET - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GAA
ASET

Financial Services

17.5%

-

Industrials

14.2%
16.3%

Real Estate

13.9%
41.6%

Energy

13.2%
7.8%

Basic Materials

9.7%
5.8%

Technology

8.7%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
0.1%

Communication Services

4.0%
12.1%

Utilities

3.8%
12.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
1.1%

Healthcare

3.2%
2.2%

Financial Services

GAA
17.5%
ASET

-

Industrials

GAA
14.2%
ASET
16.3%

Real Estate

GAA
13.9%
ASET
41.6%

Energy

GAA
13.2%
ASET
7.8%

Basic Materials

GAA
9.7%
ASET
5.8%

Technology

GAA
8.7%
ASET
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

GAA
8.5%
ASET
0.1%

Communication Services

GAA
4.0%
ASET
12.1%

Utilities

GAA
3.8%
ASET
12.8%

Consumer Defensive

GAA
3.5%
ASET
1.1%

Healthcare

GAA
3.2%
ASET
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAA vs. ASET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAA
GAA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAA Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
GAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

ASET
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAA vs. ASET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GAAASETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.04

GAA vs. ASET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GAAASETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

Drawdowns

GAA vs. ASET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAA drawdown since its inception was -26.57%, which is greater than ASET's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAA and ASET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAAASETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.57%

0.00%

-26.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

0.00%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.85%

0.00%

-3.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.51%

Volatility

GAA vs. ASET - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAAASETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.19%

0.00%

+9.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.28%

0.00%

+11.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.09%

0.00%

+11.09%

GAA vs. ASET - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAA has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than ASET's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

GAA vs. ASET - Dividend Comparison

GAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, while ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASET
FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GAA
Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF
3.59%4.24%3.88%3.73%6.05%4.21%2.73%3.32%3.01%2.36%2.82%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, GAA is cheaper at 0.41% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GAA is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for ASET.

GAA has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.00% for ASET.

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for GAA and 0.57% for ASET.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAA and ASET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer