G2X.DE vs. XDWF.DE
G2X.DE (VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF) and XDWF.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - G2X.DE is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE Arca Gold Miners, while XDWF.DE is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Financials. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, G2X.DE returned 11.22%/yr vs 13.01%/yr for XDWF.DE. Their 0.02 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. G2X.DE charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWF.DE.
Performance
G2X.DE vs. XDWF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, G2X.DE achieves a -3.35% return, which is significantly lower than XDWF.DE's 13.48% return. Over the past 10 years, G2X.DE has underperformed XDWF.DE with an annualized return of 11.22%, while XDWF.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.01% annualized return.
G2X.DE
- 1D
- 7.85%
- 1M
- 5.72%
- 6M
- -10.98%
- YTD
- -3.35%
- 1Y
- 51.33%
- 3Y*
- 41.16%
- 5Y*
- 22.42%
- 10Y*
- 11.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.36%
XDWF.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 3.05%
- 6M
- 13.18%
- YTD
- 13.48%
- 1Y
- 24.57%
- 3Y*
- 23.83%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| €4.07M | €4.59M | €6.27M | |
| €1.26M | €960.71K | €762.05K |
G2X.DE vs. XDWF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G2X.DE VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF | -3.35% | 131.10% | 17.58% | 5.59% | -0.03% | -4.26% | 13.26% | 40.99% | -4.38% | -5.31% |
XDWF.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C | 13.48% | 15.37% | 34.09% | 12.42% | -4.89% | 39.46% | -11.91% | 29.16% | -13.91% | 8.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between G2X.DE and XDWF.DE is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2015 | 0.02 |
Over the past year, G2X.DE and XDWF.DE have become more correlated (0.29) than their long-term average of 0.02, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
G2X.DE vs. XDWF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
G2X.DE
XDWF.DE
G2X.DE vs. XDWF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (G2X.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| G2X.DE | XDWF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.32 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 2.43 | -1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.02 | 7.38 | -4.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
G2X.DE vs. XDWF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum G2X.DE drawdown since its inception was -46.04%, smaller than the maximum XDWF.DE drawdown of -50.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for G2X.DE and XDWF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| G2X.DE | XDWF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.04% | -50.63% | +4.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.81% | -10.09% | -25.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.81% | -19.75% | -16.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.53% | -19.75% | -18.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.04% | -42.09% | -3.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.13% | -0.23% | -24.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.09% | -10.56% | -9.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.92% | 3.32% | +13.60% |
Volatility
G2X.DE vs. XDWF.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (G2X.DE) has a higher volatility of 14.70% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWF.DE) at 3.31%. This indicates that G2X.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| G2X.DE | XDWF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.70% | 3.31% | +11.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.64% | 9.86% | +25.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.57% | 12.91% | +33.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.29% | 16.17% | +18.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.66% | 19.25% | +13.41% |
G2X.DE vs. XDWF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
G2X.DE has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWF.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
G2X.DE vs. XDWF.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither G2X.DE nor XDWF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
G2X.DE and XDWF.DE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWF.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWF.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for G2X.DE.
G2X.DE is categorized as Gold, while XDWF.DE is Financials Equities. G2X.DE tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners, while XDWF.DE tracks MSCI World Financials. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for G2X.DE and 0.25% for XDWF.DE.
Find the right allocation for G2X.DE and XDWF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer