G2X.DE vs. LYM9.DE

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

G2X.DE (VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF) and LYM9.DE (Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - G2X.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the NYSE Arca Gold Miners, while LYM9.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI IMI New Energy ESG Filtered. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, G2X.DE returned 12.83%/yr vs 11.40%/yr for LYM9.DE. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. G2X.DE charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for LYM9.DE.

Performance

G2X.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (G2X.DE) and Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM9.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, G2X.DE achieves a -8.45% return, which is significantly lower than LYM9.DE's 34.64% return. Over the past 10 years, G2X.DE has outperformed LYM9.DE with an annualized return of 12.83%, while LYM9.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 11.40% annualized return.

G2X.DE

• 1D: 5.67%
• 1M: -16.53%
• YTD: -8.45%
• 6M: -4.07%
• 1Y: 51.00%
• 3Y*: 35.39%
• 5Y*: 18.31%
• 10Y*: 12.83%

LYM9.DE

• 1D: 3.19%
• 1M: -1.04%
• YTD: 34.64%
• 6M: 34.60%
• 1Y: 72.28%
• 3Y*: 7.60%
• 5Y*: 3.18%
• 10Y*: 11.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

G2X.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
G2X.DE VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF	-8.45%	131.10%	17.58%	5.59%	-0.03%	-4.26%	13.26%	40.99%	-4.38%	-5.31%
LYM9.DE Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist	34.64%	29.63%	-7.98%	-21.17%	-13.12%	1.13%	46.09%	50.04%	-9.16%	15.64%

Correlation

The correlation between G2X.DE and LYM9.DE is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2015	0.20

The correlation between G2X.DE and LYM9.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

G2X.DE vs. LYM9.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

G2X.DE

G2X.DE Risk / Return Rank: 35
G2X.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
G2X.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
G2X.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 35
G2X.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
G2X.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 32

LYM9.DE

LYM9.DE Risk / Return Rank: 94
LYM9.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
LYM9.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
LYM9.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 92
LYM9.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
LYM9.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

G2X.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (G2X.DE) and Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	G2X.DE	LYM9.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	3.40	-2.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.65	4.18	-2.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.55	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.52	7.12	-5.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.22	28.13	-23.92

G2X.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current G2X.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the LYM9.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of G2X.DE and LYM9.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

G2X.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum G2X.DE drawdown since its inception was -46.04%, smaller than the maximum LYM9.DE drawdown of -72.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for G2X.DE and LYM9.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	G2X.DE	LYM9.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.04%	-72.01%	+25.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.45%	-10.11%	-23.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.45%	-41.59%	+8.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.53%	-55.00%	+16.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.04%	-55.00%	+8.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.09%	-4.61%	-24.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.95%	-42.80%	+22.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.02%	2.56%	+9.46%

Volatility

G2X.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (G2X.DE) has a higher volatility of 14.79% compared to Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM9.DE) at 8.97%. This indicates that G2X.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYM9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	G2X.DE	LYM9.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.79%	8.97%	+5.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.01%	16.94%	+18.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.27%	21.19%	+22.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.32%	22.36%	+10.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.37%	21.87%	+10.50%

G2X.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

G2X.DE has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than LYM9.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

G2X.DE vs. LYM9.DE - Dividend Comparison

G2X.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LYM9.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
G2X.DE VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LYM9.DE Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist	0.31%	0.42%	0.74%	0.78%	0.25%	0.31%	0.70%	1.12%	0.67%	0.89%	1.50%	2.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both G2X.DE and LYM9.DE in my portfolio?

G2X.DE and LYM9.DE have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, G2X.DE or LYM9.DE?

On fees, G2X.DE is cheaper at 0.53% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, G2X.DE or LYM9.DE?

G2X.DE is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for LYM9.DE.

What is the main difference between G2X.DE and LYM9.DE?

G2X.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while LYM9.DE is Energy Equities. G2X.DE tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners, while LYM9.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI New Energy ESG Filtered. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for G2X.DE and 0.60% for LYM9.DE.