PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
G2X.DE vs. CNIE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

G2X.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (G2X.DE) and VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CNIE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, G2X.DE achieves a -1.03% return, which is significantly higher than CNIE.DE's -3.41% return.


G2X.DE

1D
1.09%
1M
-5.12%
YTD
-1.03%
6M
7.25%
1Y
61.18%
3Y*
37.60%
5Y*
20.05%
10Y*
13.83%

CNIE.DE

1D
-0.76%
1M
-2.69%
YTD
-3.41%
6M
-4.66%
1Y
6.66%
3Y*
-0.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

G2X.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
G2X.DE
VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF
-1.03%131.13%17.55%5.59%-0.02%11.57%
CNIE.DE
VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A
-3.41%8.76%7.28%-12.40%-22.84%8.74%

Correlation

The correlation between G2X.DE and CNIE.DE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021

0.18

The correlation between G2X.DE and CNIE.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (3 years) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

G2X.DE vs. CNIE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

G2X.DE
G2X.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
G2X.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
G2X.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
G2X.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
G2X.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
G2X.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

CNIE.DE
CNIE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
CNIE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNIE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNIE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
CNIE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNIE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

G2X.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (G2X.DE) and VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CNIE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


G2X.DECNIE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.08

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

0.53

+1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.49

1.17

+4.32

G2X.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current G2X.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the CNIE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of G2X.DE and CNIE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


G2X.DECNIE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

0.42

+1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

-0.16

+0.60

Drawdowns

G2X.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum G2X.DE drawdown since its inception was -46.04%, roughly equal to the maximum CNIE.DE drawdown of -45.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for G2X.DE and CNIE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


G2X.DECNIE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.04%

-45.69%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.90%

-12.45%

-15.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.90%

-29.20%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.34%

-25.25%

+1.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.92%

-24.67%

+4.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.09%

5.70%

+5.39%

Volatility

G2X.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (G2X.DE) has a higher volatility of 13.57% compared to VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CNIE.DE) at 4.49%. This indicates that G2X.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNIE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


G2X.DECNIE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.57%

4.49%

+9.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.36%

10.68%

+23.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.64%

16.04%

+26.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.16%

24.27%

+8.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.33%

24.27%

+8.06%

G2X.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

G2X.DE has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than CNIE.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

G2X.DE vs. CNIE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither G2X.DE nor CNIE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


G2X.DE and CNIE.DE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, G2X.DE is cheaper at 0.53% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

G2X.DE is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CNIE.DE.

G2X.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while CNIE.DE is China Equities. G2X.DE tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners, while CNIE.DE tracks MarketGrader New China ESG. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for G2X.DE and 0.60% for CNIE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for G2X.DE and CNIE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer