PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZROX vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZROX vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZROX achieves a 12.27% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 18.13% return.


FZROX

1D
1.53%
1M
1.38%
6M
10.81%
YTD
12.27%
1Y
21.86%
3Y*
20.54%
5Y*
12.28%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.26%

QQQM

1D
3.39%
1M
1.57%
6M
17.72%
YTD
18.13%
1Y
28.99%
3Y*
25.64%
5Y*
15.15%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$1.11B$953.12M$1.21B

FZROX vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
12.27%17.23%23.94%26.20%-19.21%26.00%8.55%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
18.13%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FZROX and QQQM is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020

0.91

The correlation between FZROX and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZROX vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FZROX
FZROX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FZROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZROX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FZROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZROX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FZROX vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FZROXQQQMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.26

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

2.43

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.61

7.72

+3.89

FZROX vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZROX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZROX and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FZROX vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZROX drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZROX and QQQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZROXQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.96%

-35.04%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-11.96%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.38%

-22.70%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.12%

-35.04%

+9.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.88%

+2.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-8.14%

+2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

3.76%

-1.71%

Volatility

FZROX vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) is 3.80%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 7.59%. This indicates that FZROX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZROXQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

7.59%

-3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.43%

16.26%

-5.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.18%

19.47%

-6.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.56%

22.81%

-5.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.03%

22.36%

-2.33%

FZROX vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZROX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FZROX vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

FZROX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than QQQM's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
0.91%1.02%1.16%1.36%1.57%1.25%1.27%1.51%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.44%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FZROX and QQQM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QQQM has higher volatility (7.59%) compared to FZROX (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZROX dropped -34.96% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

FZROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZROX and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer