FZOLX vs. FLDB
FZOLX (Fidelity SAI Low Duration Income Fund) and FLDB (Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF) are both funds - FZOLX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by Fidelity, while FLDB is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past year, FZOLX returned 4.26% vs 4.19% for FLDB. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FZOLX charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for FLDB.
Performance
FZOLX vs. FLDB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FZOLX achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly higher than FLDB's 1.28% return.
FZOLX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.36%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- 5.14%
- 5Y*
- 3.53%
- 10Y*
- —
FLDB
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 4.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FZOLX vs. FLDB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FZOLX Fidelity SAI Low Duration Income Fund | 1.36% | 4.85% | 5.11% |
FLDB Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF | 1.28% | 4.93% | 4.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between FZOLX and FLDB is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2024 | 0.07 |
The correlation between FZOLX and FLDB shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FZOLX vs. FLDB — Risk / Return Rank
FZOLX
FLDB
FZOLX vs. FLDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI Low Duration Income Fund (FZOLX) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FZOLX | FLDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.63 | 2.11 | +1.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.30 | 25.08 | -10.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 74.84 | 93.63 | -18.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FZOLX | FLDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.36 | 4.67 | -1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.72 | 3.56 | -0.85 |
Drawdowns
FZOLX vs. FLDB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FZOLX drawdown since its inception was -1.10%, which is greater than FLDB's maximum drawdown of -0.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZOLX and FLDB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FZOLX | FLDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.10% | -0.49% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.30% | -0.17% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.13% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.13% | -0.05% | -0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.06% | 0.04% | +0.02% |
Volatility
FZOLX vs. FLDB - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity SAI Low Duration Income Fund (FZOLX) has a higher volatility of 0.38% compared to Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF (FLDB) at 0.34%. This indicates that FZOLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FZOLX | FLDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.38% | 0.34% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.88% | 0.61% | +0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27% | 0.91% | +0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.22% | 1.31% | -0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.15% | 1.31% | -0.16% |
FZOLX vs. FLDB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FZOLX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than FLDB's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FZOLX vs. FLDB - Dividend Comparison
FZOLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, more than FLDB's 4.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLDB Fidelity Low Duration Bond ETF | 4.45% | 4.72% | 3.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FZOLX Fidelity SAI Low Duration Income Fund | 5.09% | 5.26% | 5.15% | 4.03% | 1.14% | 0.16% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FZOLX and FLDB have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FZOLX has higher volatility (0.38%) compared to FLDB (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZOLX dropped -1.10% vs FLDB's -0.49%.
FLDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.67 vs 3.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FZOLX and FLDB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer