FZIPX vs. LLSCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity ZERO Extended Market Index Fund (FZIPX) and Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX).
FZIPX is managed by Fidelity. LLSCX is managed by Longleaf Partners. It was launched on Feb 21, 1989.
Performance
FZIPX vs. LLSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FZIPX vs. LLSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZIPX Fidelity ZERO Extended Market Index Fund | -1.78% | 12.51% | 12.39% | 18.13% | -18.01% | 21.31% | 16.64% | 26.50% | -17.57% |
LLSCX Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund | -3.68% | 7.56% | 9.69% | 20.17% | -19.25% | 11.18% | 4.17% | 27.74% | -15.55% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FZIPX achieves a -1.78% return, which is significantly higher than LLSCX's -3.68% return.
FZIPX
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -8.55%
- YTD
- -1.78%
- 6M
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- 18.79%
- 3Y*
- 12.32%
- 5Y*
- 5.14%
- 10Y*
- —
LLSCX
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- YTD
- -3.68%
- 6M
- -2.59%
- 1Y
- 2.07%
- 3Y*
- 9.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.87%
- 10Y*
- 6.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FZIPX vs. LLSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FZIPX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than LLSCX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FZIPX vs. LLSCX — Risk / Return Rank
FZIPX
LLSCX
FZIPX vs. LLSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity ZERO Extended Market Index Fund (FZIPX) and Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FZIPX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 0.15 | +0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 0.32 | +1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.04 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 0.10 | +1.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.98 | 0.30 | +4.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FZIPX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 0.15 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.11 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.51 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between FZIPX and LLSCX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FZIPX vs. LLSCX - Dividend Comparison
FZIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than LLSCX's 1.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZIPX Fidelity ZERO Extended Market Index Fund | 1.27% | 1.24% | 1.22% | 1.43% | 1.64% | 6.97% | 2.15% | 1.80% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LLSCX Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund | 1.22% | 1.17% | 0.11% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 0.82% | 5.85% | 14.89% | 18.13% | 8.43% | 18.01% | 5.91% |
Drawdowns
FZIPX vs. LLSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FZIPX drawdown since its inception was -42.71%, smaller than the maximum LLSCX drawdown of -63.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZIPX and LLSCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FZIPX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.71% | -63.97% | +21.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.33% | -10.47% | -3.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.19% | -28.37% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.61% | -7.92% | -1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.09% | -8.90% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 3.68% | -0.37% |
Volatility
FZIPX vs. LLSCX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity ZERO Extended Market Index Fund (FZIPX) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) at 3.90%. This indicates that FZIPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FZIPX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 3.90% | +2.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.90% | 9.23% | +3.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.07% | 15.42% | +6.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.87% | 17.00% | +3.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.95% | 24.58% | -0.63% |