PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZIPX vs. VB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZIPX vs. VB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity ZERO Extended Market Index Fund (FZIPX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZIPX achieves a 17.12% return, which is significantly higher than VB's 15.68% return.


FZIPX

1D
1.49%
1M
3.02%
YTD
17.12%
6M
14.03%
1Y
34.74%
3Y*
17.51%
5Y*
8.45%
10Y*

VB

1D
0.26%
1M
2.83%
YTD
15.68%
6M
13.00%
1Y
30.17%
3Y*
17.54%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
11.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZIPX vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FZIPX
Fidelity ZERO Extended Market Index Fund
17.12%12.51%12.39%18.13%-18.01%21.31%16.64%26.50%-17.57%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
15.68%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%17.57%19.19%27.34%-17.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FZIPX and VB is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2018

0.99

The correlation between FZIPX and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZIPX vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZIPX
FZIPX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FZIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FZIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZIPX vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity ZERO Extended Market Index Fund (FZIPX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FZIPXVBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.31

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

3.38

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.78

12.38

+1.39

FZIPX vs. VB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZIPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the VB Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZIPX and VB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FZIPX vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZIPX drawdown since its inception was -42.71%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZIPX and VB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZIPXVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.71%

-59.56%

+16.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-8.98%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.16%

-25.36%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.19%

-28.15%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-0.39%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.87%

-8.42%

-0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

2.44%

+0.08%

Volatility

FZIPX vs. VB - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity ZERO Extended Market Index Fund (FZIPX) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 4.92%. This indicates that FZIPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZIPXVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

4.92%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.88%

12.21%

+0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.45%

16.66%

+0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.99%

20.78%

+0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.80%

21.45%

+2.35%

FZIPX vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZIPX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VB's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FZIPX vs. VB - Dividend Comparison

FZIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than VB's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FZIPX
Fidelity ZERO Extended Market Index Fund
1.06%1.24%1.22%1.43%1.64%6.97%2.15%1.80%0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.18%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FZIPX and VB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FZIPX has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to VB (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZIPX dropped -42.71% vs VB's -59.56%.

FZIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZIPX and VB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer