PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZILX vs. VOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZILX vs. VOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZILX achieves a 14.46% return, which is significantly higher than VOOG's 12.80% return.


FZILX

1D
0.60%
1M
3.44%
YTD
14.46%
6M
15.88%
1Y
31.18%
3Y*
19.17%
5Y*
8.89%
10Y*

VOOG

1D
2.86%
1M
1.56%
YTD
12.80%
6M
14.09%
1Y
32.82%
3Y*
26.64%
5Y*
15.50%
10Y*
18.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZILX vs. VOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FZILX
Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund
14.46%33.52%5.32%16.28%-15.96%8.19%11.06%21.69%-9.38%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
12.80%22.11%35.89%29.96%-29.48%31.95%33.35%30.93%-10.97%

Correlation

The correlation between FZILX and VOOG is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2018

0.71

The correlation between FZILX and VOOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZILX vs. VOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZILX
FZILX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FZILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZILX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FZILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZILX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

VOOG
VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZILX vs. VOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FZILXVOOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.34

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

2.40

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.15

9.66

+0.49

FZILX vs. VOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZILX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the VOOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZILX and VOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FZILX vs. VOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZILX drawdown since its inception was -34.37%, which is greater than VOOG's maximum drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZILX and VOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZILXVOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.37%

-32.73%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.24%

-13.71%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.47%

-22.18%

+8.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.87%

-32.73%

+2.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.58%

-1.93%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.68%

-4.96%

-1.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

3.41%

-0.49%

Volatility

FZILX vs. VOOG - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) have volatilities of 6.65% and 6.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZILXVOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.65%

6.82%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.40%

13.71%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.59%

16.80%

-1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.70%

21.33%

-5.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.39%

20.81%

-3.42%

FZILX vs. VOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZILX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VOOG's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FZILX vs. VOOG - Dividend Comparison

FZILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than VOOG's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FZILX
Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund
2.34%2.67%3.00%2.98%2.71%2.61%1.64%2.37%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.44%0.49%0.49%1.12%0.93%0.53%0.88%1.26%1.34%1.32%1.47%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


FZILX and VOOG have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOOG has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to FZILX (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZILX dropped -34.37% vs VOOG's -32.73%.

VOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZILX and VOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer