PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZILX vs. FNIDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZILX vs. FNIDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX) and Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZILX achieves a 16.29% return, which is significantly higher than FNIDX's 11.27% return.


FZILX

1D
0.71%
1M
6.20%
YTD
16.29%
6M
19.11%
1Y
34.60%
3Y*
20.62%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*

FNIDX

1D
0.89%
1M
4.36%
YTD
11.27%
6M
13.24%
1Y
27.92%
3Y*
17.30%
5Y*
6.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZILX vs. FNIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FZILX
Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund
16.29%33.52%5.32%16.28%-15.96%8.19%11.06%21.69%-9.38%
FNIDX
Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd
11.27%29.80%5.67%14.65%-18.89%7.65%12.98%22.20%-8.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FZILX and FNIDX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2018

0.99

The correlation between FZILX and FNIDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZILX vs. FNIDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZILX
FZILX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FZILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZILX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FZILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZILX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FNIDX
FNIDX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FNIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FNIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZILX vs. FNIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX) and Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FZILXFNIDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.33

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

2.40

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.91

9.14

+2.77

FZILX vs. FNIDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZILX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the FNIDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZILX and FNIDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FZILXFNIDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

1.83

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.44

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.50

+0.09

Drawdowns

FZILX vs. FNIDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZILX drawdown since its inception was -34.37%, roughly equal to the maximum FNIDX drawdown of -33.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZILX and FNIDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZILXFNIDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.37%

-33.17%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.24%

-11.36%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.47%

-14.92%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.87%

-32.79%

+2.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-8.26%

+1.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

2.97%

-0.11%

Volatility

FZILX vs. FNIDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX) at 4.45%. This indicates that FZILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZILXFNIDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

4.45%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.26%

12.32%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.62%

14.88%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.52%

15.80%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.32%

16.55%

+0.77%

FZILX vs. FNIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZILX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FNIDX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FZILX vs. FNIDX - Dividend Comparison

FZILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than FNIDX's 2.53% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNIDX
Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd
2.53%2.81%2.34%2.64%2.32%1.93%1.13%2.17%2.28%1.27%
FZILX
Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund
2.30%2.67%3.00%2.98%2.71%2.61%1.64%2.37%0.02%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FZILX and FNIDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FZILX has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to FNIDX (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZILX dropped -34.37% vs FNIDX's -33.17%.

FZILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZILX and FNIDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer