PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZILX vs. FISZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZILX vs. FISZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZILX achieves a 16.29% return, which is significantly lower than FISZX's 27.01% return.


FZILX

1D
0.71%
1M
6.20%
YTD
16.29%
6M
19.11%
1Y
34.60%
3Y*
20.62%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*

FISZX

1D
0.37%
1M
11.60%
YTD
27.01%
6M
32.57%
1Y
42.44%
3Y*
22.28%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZILX vs. FISZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FZILX
Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund
16.29%33.52%5.32%16.28%-15.96%8.19%11.06%8.46%
FISZX
Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund
27.01%31.77%3.61%15.83%-28.32%9.91%23.49%13.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FZILX and FISZX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019

0.89

The correlation between FZILX and FISZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZILX vs. FISZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZILX
FZILX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FZILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZILX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FZILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZILX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FISZX
FISZX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FISZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FISZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZILX vs. FISZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FZILXFISZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.40

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

2.89

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.91

11.38

+0.53

FZILX vs. FISZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZILX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the FISZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZILX and FISZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FZILXFISZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

2.21

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.50

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.65

-0.06

Drawdowns

FZILX vs. FISZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZILX drawdown since its inception was -34.37%, smaller than the maximum FISZX drawdown of -39.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZILX and FISZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZILXFISZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.37%

-39.92%

+5.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.24%

-14.48%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.47%

-14.63%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.87%

-39.92%

+10.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-12.37%

+5.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

3.66%

-0.80%

Volatility

FZILX vs. FISZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX) is 4.96%, while Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX) has a volatility of 7.78%. This indicates that FZILX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FISZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZILXFISZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

7.78%

-2.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.26%

16.22%

-3.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.62%

18.93%

-4.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.52%

17.84%

-2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.32%

18.27%

-0.95%

FZILX vs. FISZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZILX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FISZX's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FZILX vs. FISZX - Dividend Comparison

FZILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, more than FISZX's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FISZX
Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund
1.52%1.92%2.55%1.89%1.37%6.08%0.90%0.27%0.00%
FZILX
Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund
2.30%2.67%3.00%2.98%2.71%2.61%1.64%2.37%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FZILX and FISZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FISZX has higher volatility (7.78%) compared to FZILX (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZILX dropped -34.37% vs FISZX's -39.92%.

FZILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZILX and FISZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer