FZAPX vs. EILGX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FZAPX (Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z) and EILGX (Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FZAPX returned 15.56%/yr vs 13.51%/yr for EILGX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FZAPX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for EILGX.

Performance

FZAPX vs. EILGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z (FZAPX) and Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth (EILGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZAPX achieves a 15.59% return, which is significantly higher than EILGX's -12.06% return. Over the past 10 years, FZAPX has outperformed EILGX with an annualized return of 15.56%, while EILGX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.51% annualized return.

FZAPX

• 1D: 1.44%
• 1M: 1.85%
• YTD: 15.59%
• 6M: 15.38%
• 1Y: 35.90%
• 3Y*: 21.89%
• 5Y*: 13.26%
• 10Y*: 15.56%

EILGX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -1.87%
• YTD: -12.06%
• 6M: -12.16%
• 1Y: -5.90%
• 3Y*: 6.39%
• 5Y*: 5.01%
• 10Y*: 13.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZAPX vs. EILGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FZAPX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z	15.59%	18.98%	19.88%	27.05%	-19.49%	23.25%	25.03%	32.34%	-8.52%	24.38%
EILGX Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth	-12.06%	10.85%	10.63%	25.66%	-20.27%	30.41%	27.18%	38.37%	8.31%	27.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FZAPX and EILGX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2013	0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between FZAPX and EILGX has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FZAPX vs. EILGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZAPX

FZAPX Risk / Return Rank: 85
FZAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FZAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FZAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
FZAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FZAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

EILGX

EILGX Risk / Return Rank: 1
EILGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
EILGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
EILGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
EILGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
EILGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZAPX vs. EILGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z (FZAPX) and Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth (EILGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FZAPX	EILGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	-0.48	+3.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	-0.60	+4.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	0.93	+0.54
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.91	-0.40	+4.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.41	-0.89	+19.29

FZAPX vs. EILGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZAPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the EILGX Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZAPX and EILGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FZAPX vs. EILGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZAPX drawdown since its inception was -34.37%, smaller than the maximum EILGX drawdown of -51.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAPX and EILGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FZAPX	EILGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.37%	-51.01%	+16.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.20%	-14.90%	+5.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.84%	-14.90%	-5.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.20%	-27.35%	+2.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.37%	-30.85%	-3.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-14.00%	+13.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.55%	-7.13%	+2.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	6.76%	-4.81%

Volatility

FZAPX vs. EILGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z (FZAPX) has a higher volatility of 5.46% compared to Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth (EILGX) at 4.64%. This indicates that FZAPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EILGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FZAPX	EILGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.46%	4.64%	+0.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.08%	10.06%	+1.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.77%	12.53%	+1.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.88%	16.78%	+1.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.62%	17.93%	+0.69%

FZAPX vs. EILGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZAPX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than EILGX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

FZAPX vs. EILGX - Dividend Comparison

FZAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, less than EILGX's 17.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EILGX Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth	17.50%	15.39%	4.34%	0.57%	0.32%	2.18%	0.62%	0.17%	19.72%	54.05%	17.75%	23.15%
FZAPX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z	4.23%	4.88%	4.91%	2.12%	0.39%	1.47%	5.33%	6.18%	4.59%	3.07%	1.13%	5.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FZAPX and EILGX in my portfolio?

FZAPX and EILGX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FZAPX or EILGX?

FZAPX has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to EILGX (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZAPX dropped -34.37% vs EILGX's -51.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FZAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.