FZAMX vs. SWMCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX) and Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX).
FZAMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 13, 2013. SWMCX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
FZAMX vs. SWMCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FZAMX vs. SWMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZAMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z | 1.33% | 12.00% | 17.39% | 15.15% | -14.70% | 25.40% | 18.84% | 23.85% | -14.85% | 0.33% |
SWMCX Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund | -1.32% | 10.54% | 15.28% | 17.20% | -17.31% | 22.55% | 17.03% | 30.46% | -9.16% | 0.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FZAMX achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly higher than SWMCX's -1.32% return.
FZAMX
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- -8.81%
- YTD
- 1.33%
- 6M
- 5.63%
- 1Y
- 21.86%
- 3Y*
- 14.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
SWMCX
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -7.73%
- YTD
- -1.32%
- 6M
- -1.19%
- 1Y
- 12.94%
- 3Y*
- 12.30%
- 5Y*
- 6.67%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FZAMX vs. SWMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FZAMX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than SWMCX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FZAMX vs. SWMCX — Risk / Return Rank
FZAMX
SWMCX
FZAMX vs. SWMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX) and Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FZAMX | SWMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 0.72 | +0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 1.12 | +0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.16 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 0.86 | +0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.87 | 4.04 | +1.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FZAMX | SWMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 0.72 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.37 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.45 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between FZAMX and SWMCX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FZAMX vs. SWMCX - Dividend Comparison
FZAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.96%, more than SWMCX's 2.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZAMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z | 6.96% | 10.09% | 6.93% | 2.83% | 5.86% | 18.58% | 1.41% | 3.50% | 10.72% | 7.81% | 5.00% | 4.90% |
SWMCX Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund | 2.15% | 2.13% | 2.60% | 1.49% | 1.59% | 2.93% | 1.45% | 2.44% | 1.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FZAMX vs. SWMCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FZAMX drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, roughly equal to the maximum SWMCX drawdown of -40.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAMX and SWMCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FZAMX | SWMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.32% | -40.34% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.82% | -13.43% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.24% | -26.09% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.77% | -8.15% | -1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.14% | -6.75% | +0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 2.87% | +0.47% |
Volatility
FZAMX vs. SWMCX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX) has a higher volatility of 7.69% compared to Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX) at 4.80%. This indicates that FZAMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FZAMX | SWMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.69% | 4.80% | +2.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.44% | 10.19% | +3.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.07% | 18.96% | +3.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 18.23% | +1.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 20.76% | +0.09% |