FZAMX vs. FSPGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX).
FZAMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 13, 2013. FSPGX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
FZAMX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FZAMX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZAMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z | 1.33% | 12.00% | 17.39% | 15.15% | -14.70% | 25.40% | 18.84% | 23.85% | -14.85% | 19.79% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.03% | 18.54% | 33.27% | 42.77% | -29.17% | 27.57% | 38.46% | 36.38% | -1.79% | 27.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FZAMX achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's -13.03% return.
FZAMX
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- -8.81%
- YTD
- 1.33%
- 6M
- 5.63%
- 1Y
- 21.86%
- 3Y*
- 14.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
FSPGX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -13.03%
- 6M
- -12.06%
- 1Y
- 14.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.91%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FZAMX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FZAMX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FZAMX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank
FZAMX
FSPGX
FZAMX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FZAMX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 0.66 | +0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 1.10 | +0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.15 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 0.72 | +0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.87 | 2.51 | +3.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FZAMX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 0.66 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.56 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.78 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between FZAMX and FSPGX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FZAMX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison
FZAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.96%, more than FSPGX's 0.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZAMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z | 6.96% | 10.09% | 6.93% | 2.83% | 5.86% | 18.58% | 1.41% | 3.50% | 10.72% | 7.81% | 5.00% | 4.90% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.40% | 0.34% | 0.37% | 0.73% | 0.86% | 2.22% | 1.76% | 1.04% | 1.32% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FZAMX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FZAMX drawdown since its inception was -42.32%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAMX and FSPGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FZAMX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.32% | -32.66% | -9.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.82% | -16.17% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.24% | -32.66% | +7.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.77% | -16.17% | +6.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.14% | -6.43% | +0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 4.63% | -1.29% |
Volatility
FZAMX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX) has a higher volatility of 7.69% compared to Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) at 5.33%. This indicates that FZAMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FZAMX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.69% | 5.33% | +2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.44% | 11.79% | +1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.07% | 22.32% | -0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 21.46% | -1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 21.63% | -0.78% |