PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZALX vs. FTRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZALX vs. FTRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class I (FTRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FZALX having a 10.90% return and FTRIX slightly lower at 10.84%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FZALX having a 16.75% annualized return and FTRIX not far behind at 16.59%.


FZALX

1D
0.41%
1M
3.21%
YTD
10.90%
6M
13.34%
1Y
32.73%
3Y*
25.87%
5Y*
16.43%
10Y*
16.75%

FTRIX

1D
0.41%
1M
3.22%
YTD
10.84%
6M
13.28%
1Y
32.57%
3Y*
25.71%
5Y*
16.30%
10Y*
16.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZALX vs. FTRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FZALX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z
10.90%27.07%26.13%26.63%-8.89%26.44%13.06%31.25%-7.31%18.01%
FTRIX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class I
10.84%26.92%26.00%26.46%-9.00%26.26%12.96%31.06%-7.43%17.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FZALX and FTRIX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2013

1.00

The correlation between FZALX and FTRIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZALX vs. FTRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZALX
FZALX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FZALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZALX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FZALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZALX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FTRIX
FTRIX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FTRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FTRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZALX vs. FTRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class I (FTRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FZALXFTRIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.82

2.81

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.85

3.83

+0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.51

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.73

3.71

+0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.99

16.89

+0.09

FZALX vs. FTRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZALX Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is comparable to the FTRIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZALX and FTRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FZALXFTRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82

2.81

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.98

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

0.92

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.61

+0.25

Drawdowns

FZALX vs. FTRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZALX drawdown since its inception was -35.23%, smaller than the maximum FTRIX drawdown of -52.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZALX and FTRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZALXFTRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.23%

-52.46%

+17.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.99%

-9.01%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.49%

-18.49%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.25%

-23.31%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.23%

-35.22%

-0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-6.54%

+2.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

1.98%

0.00%

Volatility

FZALX vs. FTRIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class I (FTRIX) have volatilities of 2.71% and 2.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZALXFTRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

2.68%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.07%

9.05%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.00%

12.01%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.70%

16.69%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.14%

18.13%

+0.01%

FZALX vs. FTRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZALX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than FTRIX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FZALX vs. FTRIX - Dividend Comparison

FZALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than FTRIX's 3.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTRIX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class I
3.53%3.91%2.68%2.09%4.38%4.75%8.02%12.76%21.72%16.33%1.96%4.15%
FZALX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z
3.64%4.04%2.83%2.17%4.51%4.92%8.14%13.19%21.94%16.56%2.12%4.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FZALX and FTRIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FZALX has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to FTRIX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZALX dropped -35.23% vs FTRIX's -52.46%.

FZALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZALX and FTRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer