FZALX vs. AIGOX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FZALX (Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z) and AIGOX (Alger Growth & Income Portfolio) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FZALX returned 16.39%/yr vs 15.24%/yr for AIGOX. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FZALX charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for AIGOX.

Performance

FZALX vs. AIGOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX) and Alger Growth & Income Portfolio (AIGOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZALX achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly lower than AIGOX's 13.23% return. Over the past 10 years, FZALX has outperformed AIGOX with an annualized return of 16.39%, while AIGOX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.24% annualized return.

FZALX

• 1D: 2.14%
• 1M: 0.20%
• 6M: 7.48%
• YTD: 10.77%
• 1Y: 23.66%
• 3Y*: 22.95%
• 5Y*: 16.54%
• 10Y*: 16.39%
• ALL TIME*: 14.68%

AIGOX

• 1D: 1.59%
• 1M: -0.23%
• 6M: 10.74%
• YTD: 13.23%
• 1Y: 27.50%
• 3Y*: 20.55%
• 5Y*: 14.00%
• 10Y*: 15.24%
• ALL TIME*: 7.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AIGOX Alger Growth & Income Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FZALX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FZALX vs. AIGOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FZALX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z	10.77%	27.07%	26.13%	26.63%	-8.89%	26.44%	13.06%	31.25%	-7.31%	18.01%
AIGOX Alger Growth & Income Portfolio	13.23%	19.79%	23.07%	23.62%	-15.15%	31.82%	14.86%	29.48%	-4.61%	21.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FZALX and AIGOX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2013	0.93

The correlation between FZALX and AIGOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FZALX vs. AIGOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FZALX

FZALX Risk / Return Rank: 73
FZALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FZALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FZALX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FZALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FZALX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

AIGOX

AIGOX Risk / Return Rank: 82
AIGOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
AIGOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
AIGOX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
AIGOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
AIGOX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FZALX vs. AIGOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX) and Alger Growth & Income Portfolio (AIGOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FZALX	AIGOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	1.88	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	2.66	-0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.33	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	3.11	-0.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.28	13.32	-3.04

FZALX vs. AIGOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZALX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the AIGOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZALX and AIGOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FZALX vs. AIGOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZALX drawdown since its inception was -35.23%, smaller than the maximum AIGOX drawdown of -63.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZALX and AIGOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FZALX	AIGOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.23%	-63.78%	+28.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.99%	-8.11%	-0.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.49%	-18.83%	+0.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.25%	-23.30%	+0.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.23%	-34.18%	-1.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.41%	-1.56%	+0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.75%	-15.32%	+11.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	1.89%	+0.19%

Volatility

FZALX vs. AIGOX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to Alger Growth & Income Portfolio (AIGOX) at 3.43%. This indicates that FZALX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIGOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FZALX	AIGOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.63%	3.43%	+0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.97%	10.37%	-0.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.86%	13.40%	-0.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.72%	17.34%	-0.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.10%	18.03%	+0.07%

FZALX vs. AIGOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZALX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than AIGOX's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

FZALX vs. AIGOX - Dividend Comparison

FZALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, less than AIGOX's 12.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AIGOX Alger Growth & Income Portfolio	12.00%	13.51%	1.23%	4.06%	8.76%	8.32%	1.66%	10.86%	8.44%	1.42%	1.17%	1.72%
FZALX Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z	3.64%	4.04%	2.83%	2.17%	4.51%	4.92%	8.14%	13.19%	21.94%	16.56%	2.12%	4.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FZALX and AIGOX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, FZALX and AIGOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FZALX or AIGOX?

FZALX has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to AIGOX (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZALX dropped -35.23% vs AIGOX's -63.78%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIGOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.