PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZAJX vs. FHLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZAJX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class Z (FZAJX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZAJX achieves a 7.55% return, which is significantly lower than FHLFX's 12.57% return.


FZAJX

1D
3.79%
1M
-2.64%
6M
2.10%
YTD
7.55%
1Y
14.76%
3Y*
11.67%
5Y*
4.96%
10Y*
9.27%
ALL TIME*
8.31%

FHLFX

1D
2.59%
1M
1.98%
6M
7.18%
YTD
12.57%
1Y
26.19%
3Y*
16.52%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FZAJX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FZAJX
Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class Z
7.55%18.02%5.02%21.03%-23.11%15.55%17.11%34.21%-12.48%
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
12.57%31.96%3.67%18.16%-14.17%11.23%8.09%21.66%-10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FZAJX and FHLFX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.92

The correlation between FZAJX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZAJX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FZAJX
FZAJX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FZAJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZAJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZAJX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FZAJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZAJX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

FHLFX
FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FZAJX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class Z (FZAJX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FZAJXFHLFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.29

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

2.19

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.33

8.31

-4.98

FZAJX vs. FHLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZAJX Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the FHLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZAJX and FHLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FZAJX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZAJX drawdown since its inception was -34.84%, roughly equal to the maximum FHLFX drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAJX and FHLFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZAJXFHLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.84%

-33.58%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.96%

-11.37%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-13.62%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.84%

-29.36%

-5.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.81%

0.00%

-4.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.60%

-6.01%

-0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

3.00%

+1.07%

Volatility

FZAJX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class Z (FZAJX) has a higher volatility of 6.80% compared to Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) at 4.58%. This indicates that FZAJX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZAJXFHLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.80%

4.58%

+2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.31%

13.23%

+5.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.61%

15.54%

+5.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.59%

16.11%

+2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.91%

17.62%

+0.29%

FZAJX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZAJX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FZAJX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison

FZAJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than FHLFX's 3.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
3.07%3.46%2.98%2.86%2.60%2.47%1.92%1.95%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FZAJX
Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class Z
3.39%3.65%1.00%0.61%1.81%2.03%0.22%1.11%1.04%0.12%1.40%0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FZAJX and FHLFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FZAJX has higher volatility (6.80%) compared to FHLFX (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZAJX dropped -34.84% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.

FHLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZAJX and FHLFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer