PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZAJX vs. BUFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZAJX vs. BUFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class Z (FZAJX) and Buffalo International Fund (BUFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZAJX achieves a 5.92% return, which is significantly lower than BUFIX's 17.82% return. Over the past 10 years, FZAJX has underperformed BUFIX with an annualized return of 9.26%, while BUFIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.23% annualized return.


FZAJX

1D
-1.28%
1M
0.54%
YTD
5.92%
6M
8.29%
1Y
13.02%
3Y*
12.03%
5Y*
5.38%
10Y*
9.26%

BUFIX

1D
1.26%
1M
9.49%
YTD
17.82%
6M
21.24%
1Y
20.57%
3Y*
11.94%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*
10.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZAJX vs. BUFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FZAJX
Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class Z
5.92%18.02%5.02%21.03%-23.11%15.55%17.11%34.21%-11.40%28.88%
BUFIX
Buffalo International Fund
17.82%17.09%-1.90%18.33%-21.80%18.20%19.10%28.01%-8.85%29.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FZAJX and BUFIX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2013

0.93

The correlation between FZAJX and BUFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZAJX vs. BUFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZAJX
FZAJX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FZAJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZAJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZAJX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FZAJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZAJX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFIX
BUFIX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BUFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZAJX vs. BUFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class Z (FZAJX) and Buffalo International Fund (BUFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FZAJXBUFIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.76

1.27

-0.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

1.82

-0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.23

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

1.67

-0.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.58

5.83

-2.25

FZAJX vs. BUFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZAJX Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the BUFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZAJX and BUFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FZAJXBUFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

1.27

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.34

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.59

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.34

+0.16

Drawdowns

FZAJX vs. BUFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZAJX drawdown since its inception was -34.84%, smaller than the maximum BUFIX drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAJX and BUFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZAJXBUFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.84%

-55.09%

+20.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.96%

-12.85%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-15.52%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.84%

-34.93%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.84%

-34.93%

+0.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.34%

0.00%

-3.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.64%

-9.17%

+2.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

3.68%

+0.08%

Volatility

FZAJX vs. BUFIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class Z (FZAJX) and Buffalo International Fund (BUFIX) have volatilities of 7.23% and 7.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZAJXBUFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.23%

7.06%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.86%

14.73%

+1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.25%

17.16%

+1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.08%

17.56%

+0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.83%

17.52%

+0.31%

FZAJX vs. BUFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZAJX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFIX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FZAJX vs. BUFIX - Dividend Comparison

FZAJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, more than BUFIX's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFIX
Buffalo International Fund
0.72%0.85%0.84%0.59%1.85%1.20%0.28%0.57%2.42%0.36%0.00%0.51%
FZAJX
Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class Z
3.45%3.65%1.00%0.61%1.81%2.03%0.22%1.11%1.04%0.12%1.40%0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, FZAJX and BUFIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FZAJX has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to BUFIX (7.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZAJX dropped -34.84% vs BUFIX's -55.09%.

BUFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZAJX and BUFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer