FZAHX vs. FSKAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z (FZAHX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX).
FZAHX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 13, 2013. FSKAX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
FZAHX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FZAHX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZAHX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z | -13.57% | 22.61% | 39.23% | 45.70% | -38.18% | 11.74% | 69.25% | 40.80% | 15.25% | 35.10% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | -6.77% | 17.06% | 23.89% | 26.12% | -19.53% | 25.66% | 20.79% | 30.92% | -5.32% | 20.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FZAHX achieves a -13.57% return, which is significantly lower than FSKAX's -6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FZAHX has outperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 19.08%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.23% annualized return.
FZAHX
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -9.92%
- YTD
- -13.57%
- 6M
- -12.17%
- 1Y
- 18.83%
- 3Y*
- 23.35%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 19.08%
FSKAX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -7.69%
- YTD
- -6.77%
- 6M
- -4.56%
- 1Y
- 14.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FZAHX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FZAHX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FZAHX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank
FZAHX
FSKAX
FZAHX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z (FZAHX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FZAHX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 0.83 | -0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | 1.29 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.19 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 1.04 | -0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.53 | 5.05 | -1.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FZAHX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 0.83 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.59 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.72 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.78 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between FZAHX and FSKAX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FZAHX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison
FZAHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, more than FSKAX's 1.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZAHX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z | 4.17% | 3.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.45% | 5.15% | 3.74% | 11.00% | 7.50% | 14.42% | 10.52% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | 1.09% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.41% | 1.62% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.94% | 2.54% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 0.82% |
Drawdowns
FZAHX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FZAHX drawdown since its inception was -44.45%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAHX and FSKAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FZAHX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.45% | -35.01% | -9.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.06% | -12.42% | -3.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.45% | -25.39% | -19.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.45% | -35.01% | -9.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.06% | -8.92% | -7.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.30% | -4.05% | -4.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 2.57% | +1.81% |
Volatility
FZAHX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class Z (FZAHX) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) at 4.42%. This indicates that FZAHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FZAHX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 4.42% | +2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.04% | 9.40% | +4.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.02% | 18.50% | +5.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.80% | 17.38% | +7.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.78% | 18.42% | +5.36% |