PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZAFX vs. POGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZAFX vs. POGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) and PrimeCap Odyssey Growth Fund (POGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZAFX achieves a 15.53% return, which is significantly lower than POGRX's 26.45% return. Over the past 10 years, FZAFX has outperformed POGRX with an annualized return of 18.32%, while POGRX has yielded a comparatively lower 17.39% annualized return.


FZAFX

1D
0.42%
1M
7.33%
YTD
15.53%
6M
14.97%
1Y
31.11%
3Y*
21.44%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
18.32%

POGRX

1D
-0.02%
1M
15.42%
YTD
26.45%
6M
27.81%
1Y
64.17%
3Y*
29.06%
5Y*
16.04%
10Y*
17.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZAFX vs. POGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FZAFX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z
15.53%14.68%18.15%35.80%-24.36%23.09%43.86%35.68%0.36%35.37%
POGRX
PrimeCap Odyssey Growth Fund
26.45%32.99%13.09%23.85%-14.61%18.81%17.05%23.98%-4.56%32.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FZAFX and POGRX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2013

0.87

The correlation between FZAFX and POGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZAFX vs. POGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZAFX
FZAFX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
FZAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FZAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

POGRX
POGRX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
POGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
POGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
POGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
POGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZAFX vs. POGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) and PrimeCap Odyssey Growth Fund (POGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FZAFXPOGRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.96

3.69

-1.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.65

4.84

-2.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.65

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

4.60

-2.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.75

19.58

-9.83

FZAFX vs. POGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZAFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is lower than the POGRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZAFX and POGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FZAFXPOGRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

3.69

-1.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.82

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.85

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.66

+0.18

Drawdowns

FZAFX vs. POGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZAFX drawdown since its inception was -31.13%, smaller than the maximum POGRX drawdown of -51.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAFX and POGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZAFXPOGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.13%

-51.63%

+20.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.55%

-14.40%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.19%

-22.13%

-7.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.73%

-26.85%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.13%

-35.29%

+4.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.02%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.78%

-7.13%

+1.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

3.37%

-0.09%

Volatility

FZAFX vs. POGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z (FZAFX) is 4.18%, while PrimeCap Odyssey Growth Fund (POGRX) has a volatility of 7.05%. This indicates that FZAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZAFXPOGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

7.05%

-2.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.69%

14.59%

-1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.32%

17.96%

-1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.62%

19.60%

+1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.76%

20.47%

+0.29%

FZAFX vs. POGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZAFX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than POGRX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FZAFX vs. POGRX - Dividend Comparison

FZAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than POGRX's 19.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FZAFX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class Z
0.44%0.51%0.00%0.48%1.93%11.39%10.84%9.53%6.38%11.66%5.87%0.00%
POGRX
PrimeCap Odyssey Growth Fund
19.68%24.89%20.79%13.28%12.36%13.68%12.50%5.13%2.45%1.54%5.83%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


FZAFX and POGRX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POGRX has higher volatility (7.05%) compared to FZAFX (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZAFX dropped -31.13% vs POGRX's -51.63%.

POGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZAFX and POGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer