PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZAEX vs. PZIEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZAEX vs. PZIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z (FZAEX) and Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class (PZIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZAEX achieves a 31.16% return, which is significantly higher than PZIEX's 15.84% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FZAEX having a 13.20% annualized return and PZIEX not far behind at 12.59%.


FZAEX

1D
2.30%
1M
12.21%
YTD
31.16%
6M
34.89%
1Y
67.24%
3Y*
28.42%
5Y*
9.20%
10Y*
13.20%

PZIEX

1D
1.20%
1M
3.31%
YTD
15.84%
6M
17.57%
1Y
43.33%
3Y*
22.36%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
12.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZAEX vs. PZIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FZAEX
Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z
31.16%40.25%9.43%8.60%-19.75%-2.50%30.63%29.94%-17.95%46.69%
PZIEX
Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class
15.84%35.49%4.54%20.73%-5.67%6.65%8.43%13.57%-10.23%29.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FZAEX and PZIEX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.69

The correlation between FZAEX and PZIEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZAEX vs. PZIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZAEX
FZAEX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FZAEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZAEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZAEX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FZAEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZAEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

PZIEX
PZIEX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PZIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PZIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZAEX vs. PZIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z (FZAEX) and Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class (PZIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FZAEXPZIEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.87

2.88

+0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.79

3.81

+0.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

1.52

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.85

3.24

+1.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.86

10.93

+8.93

FZAEX vs. PZIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZAEX Sharpe Ratio is 3.87, which is higher than the PZIEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZAEX and PZIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FZAEXPZIEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.87

2.88

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.77

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.82

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.62

-0.03

Drawdowns

FZAEX vs. PZIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZAEX drawdown since its inception was -41.73%, smaller than the maximum PZIEX drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAEX and PZIEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZAEXPZIEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.73%

-44.59%

+2.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.71%

-12.79%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-16.40%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.39%

-25.38%

-15.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.73%

-44.59%

+2.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.32%

+3.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.40%

-9.58%

-2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

3.80%

-0.45%

Volatility

FZAEX vs. PZIEX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z (FZAEX) has a higher volatility of 7.76% compared to Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class (PZIEX) at 4.40%. This indicates that FZAEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PZIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZAEXPZIEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.76%

4.40%

+3.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.34%

12.68%

+2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.94%

14.89%

+3.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.90%

14.73%

+4.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.81%

15.37%

+3.44%

FZAEX vs. PZIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZAEX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than PZIEX's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FZAEX vs. PZIEX - Dividend Comparison

FZAEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than PZIEX's 4.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FZAEX
Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z
1.26%1.65%1.36%1.69%1.23%5.35%2.23%11.13%0.78%0.10%0.63%0.34%
PZIEX
Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class
4.15%4.81%7.38%5.79%2.08%2.79%1.28%6.32%1.28%1.41%0.98%2.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


FZAEX and PZIEX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FZAEX has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to PZIEX (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZAEX dropped -41.73% vs PZIEX's -44.59%.

FZAEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.87 vs 2.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZAEX and PZIEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer