FZAEX vs. EDIV
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z (FZAEX) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV).
FZAEX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 13, 2013. EDIV is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2011.
Performance
FZAEX vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FZAEX vs. EDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZAEX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z | 4.43% | 40.25% | 9.43% | 8.60% | -19.75% | -2.50% | 30.63% | 29.94% | -17.95% | 46.69% |
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 1.86% | 16.45% | 12.75% | 41.91% | -15.31% | 11.21% | -9.95% | 11.80% | -6.16% | 28.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FZAEX achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly higher than EDIV's 1.86% return. Over the past 10 years, FZAEX has outperformed EDIV with an annualized return of 10.89%, while EDIV has yielded a comparatively lower 8.40% annualized return.
FZAEX
- 1D
- 3.46%
- 1M
- -8.80%
- YTD
- 4.43%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 36.89%
- 3Y*
- 18.90%
- 5Y*
- 5.41%
- 10Y*
- 10.89%
EDIV
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -5.30%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 3.56%
- 1Y
- 15.65%
- 3Y*
- 20.17%
- 5Y*
- 10.65%
- 10Y*
- 8.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FZAEX vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FZAEX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than EDIV's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FZAEX vs. EDIV — Risk / Return Rank
FZAEX
EDIV
FZAEX vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z (FZAEX) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FZAEX | EDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.05 | 1.14 | +0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.58 | 1.61 | +0.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.23 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 1.57 | +1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.21 | 5.68 | +4.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FZAEX | EDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 1.14 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.77 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.48 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.15 | +0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between FZAEX and EDIV is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FZAEX vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison
FZAEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than EDIV's 4.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZAEX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z | 1.58% | 1.65% | 1.36% | 1.69% | 1.23% | 5.35% | 2.23% | 11.13% | 0.78% | 0.10% | 0.63% | 0.34% |
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 4.70% | 4.69% | 3.94% | 4.26% | 4.94% | 3.84% | 3.52% | 3.83% | 3.41% | 2.99% | 4.94% | 5.33% |
Drawdowns
FZAEX vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FZAEX drawdown since its inception was -41.73%, smaller than the maximum EDIV drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAEX and EDIV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FZAEX | EDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.73% | -53.36% | +11.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.71% | -10.36% | -3.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.39% | -28.32% | -12.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.73% | -40.76% | -0.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.73% | -8.17% | -2.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.53% | -19.53% | +7.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 2.87% | +0.73% |
Volatility
FZAEX vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z (FZAEX) has a higher volatility of 9.38% compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) at 5.79%. This indicates that FZAEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FZAEX | EDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.38% | 5.79% | +3.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.47% | 9.12% | +4.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.66% | 13.76% | +4.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.52% | 13.81% | +4.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.58% | 17.58% | +1.00% |