PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZAEX vs. FTMKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZAEX vs. FTMKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z (FZAEX) and Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class M (FTMKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FZAEX having a 29.72% return and FTMKX slightly lower at 29.38%. Over the past 10 years, FZAEX has outperformed FTMKX with an annualized return of 13.00%, while FTMKX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.26% annualized return.


FZAEX

1D
-1.56%
1M
4.56%
YTD
29.72%
6M
32.15%
1Y
62.24%
3Y*
27.93%
5Y*
8.86%
10Y*
13.00%

FTMKX

1D
-1.56%
1M
4.51%
YTD
29.38%
6M
31.75%
1Y
61.27%
3Y*
27.13%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*
12.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZAEX vs. FTMKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FZAEX
Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z
29.72%40.25%9.43%8.60%-19.75%-2.50%30.63%29.94%-17.95%46.69%
FTMKX
Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class M
29.38%39.38%8.73%7.84%-20.29%-3.19%29.65%28.95%-18.56%46.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FZAEX and FTMKX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2013

1.00

The correlation between FZAEX and FTMKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZAEX vs. FTMKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZAEX
FZAEX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FZAEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZAEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZAEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FZAEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZAEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

FTMKX
FTMKX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FTMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FTMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZAEX vs. FTMKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z (FZAEX) and Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class M (FTMKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FZAEXFTMKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.63

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.67

4.59

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.05

18.68

+0.37

FZAEX vs. FTMKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZAEX Sharpe Ratio is 3.54, which is comparable to the FTMKX Sharpe Ratio of 3.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZAEX and FTMKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FZAEXFTMKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.54

3.48

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.43

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.65

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.43

+0.16

Drawdowns

FZAEX vs. FTMKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZAEX drawdown since its inception was -41.73%, smaller than the maximum FTMKX drawdown of -70.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAEX and FTMKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZAEXFTMKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.73%

-70.17%

+28.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.71%

-13.75%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-18.94%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.15%

-40.72%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.73%

-42.43%

+0.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.05%

-3.06%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.38%

-20.98%

+8.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

3.37%

-0.01%

Volatility

FZAEX vs. FTMKX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z (FZAEX) and Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class M (FTMKX) have volatilities of 8.33% and 8.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZAEXFTMKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.33%

8.33%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.64%

15.64%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.14%

18.14%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.94%

18.94%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.82%

18.83%

-0.01%

FZAEX vs. FTMKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZAEX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than FTMKX's 1.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

FZAEX vs. FTMKX - Dividend Comparison

FZAEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than FTMKX's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTMKX
Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class M
0.80%1.04%0.78%0.98%0.47%4.58%1.62%10.48%0.00%0.08%0.00%0.00%
FZAEX
Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z
1.27%1.65%1.36%1.69%1.23%5.35%2.23%11.13%0.78%0.10%0.63%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FZAEX and FTMKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTMKX has higher volatility (8.33%) compared to FZAEX (8.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZAEX dropped -41.73% vs FTMKX's -70.17%.

FZAEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.54 vs 3.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZAEX and FTMKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer