FTMKX vs. EMF
FTMKX (Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class M) and EMF (Templeton Emerging Markets Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FTMKX returned 10.89%/yr vs 13.35%/yr for EMF. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FTMKX charges 1.61%/yr vs 1.43%/yr for EMF.
Performance
FTMKX vs. EMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTMKX achieves a 20.17% return, which is significantly lower than EMF's 27.21% return. Over the past 10 years, FTMKX has underperformed EMF with an annualized return of 10.89%, while EMF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.35% annualized return.
FTMKX
- 1D
- 4.16%
- 1M
- -2.87%
- 6M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- 20.17%
- 1Y
- 41.50%
- 3Y*
- 21.10%
- 5Y*
- 8.69%
- 10Y*
- 10.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.74%
EMF
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- -5.02%
- 6M
- 9.69%
- YTD
- 27.21%
- 1Y
- 55.05%
- 3Y*
- 28.54%
- 5Y*
- 12.12%
- 10Y*
- 13.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.08M | $849.02K | $917.55K | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FTMKX vs. EMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTMKX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class M | 20.17% | 39.38% | 8.73% | 7.84% | -20.29% | -3.19% | 29.65% | 28.95% | -18.56% | 46.33% |
EMF Templeton Emerging Markets Fund | 27.21% | 58.20% | 6.56% | 8.84% | -21.53% | -8.23% | 24.48% | 27.20% | -14.78% | 53.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTMKX and EMF is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2004 | 0.79 |
The correlation between FTMKX and EMF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTMKX vs. EMF — Risk / Return Rank
FTMKX
EMF
FTMKX vs. EMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class M (FTMKX) and Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTMKX | EMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.38 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 2.86 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.66 | 9.04 | -0.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTMKX vs. EMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTMKX drawdown since its inception was -70.17%, smaller than the maximum EMF drawdown of -76.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTMKX and EMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTMKX | EMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.17% | -76.97% | +6.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.75% | -19.48% | +5.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.94% | -19.48% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.17% | -40.33% | +3.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.43% | -47.65% | +5.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.96% | -13.30% | +3.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.88% | -28.90% | +8.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.50% | 6.15% | -1.65% |
Volatility
FTMKX vs. EMF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class M (FTMKX) is 9.09%, while Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that FTMKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTMKX | EMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.09% | 9.86% | -0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.32% | 23.40% | -3.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.33% | 26.33% | -4.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.72% | 21.21% | -1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.19% | 20.86% | -1.67% |
FTMKX vs. EMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTMKX has a 1.61% expense ratio, which is higher than EMF's 1.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTMKX vs. EMF - Dividend Comparison
FTMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than EMF's 7.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMF Templeton Emerging Markets Fund | 7.91% | 9.73% | 4.28% | 6.22% | 9.89% | 6.92% | 3.51% | 7.36% | 5.92% | 12.11% | 1.62% | 12.81% |
FTMKX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class M | 0.86% | 1.04% | 0.78% | 0.98% | 0.47% | 4.58% | 1.62% | 10.48% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTMKX and EMF have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMF has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to FTMKX (9.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTMKX dropped -70.17% vs EMF's -76.97%.
EMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTMKX and EMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer