PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZAEX vs. FTIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZAEX vs. FTIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z (FZAEX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZAEX achieves a 26.75% return, which is significantly higher than FTIHX's 12.53% return. Over the past 10 years, FZAEX has outperformed FTIHX with an annualized return of 13.08%, while FTIHX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.93% annualized return.


FZAEX

1D
0.81%
1M
-1.09%
YTD
26.75%
6M
27.74%
1Y
54.49%
3Y*
26.61%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*
13.08%

FTIHX

1D
0.05%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
12.53%
6M
12.53%
1Y
27.71%
3Y*
18.91%
5Y*
8.18%
10Y*
9.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZAEX vs. FTIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FZAEX
Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z
26.75%40.25%9.43%8.60%-19.75%-2.50%30.63%29.94%-17.95%46.69%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
12.53%32.59%4.98%15.49%-16.29%8.45%11.09%21.50%-14.40%25.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FZAEX and FTIHX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2016

0.86

The correlation between FZAEX and FTIHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZAEX vs. FTIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZAEX
FZAEX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FZAEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZAEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZAEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FZAEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZAEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FTIHX
FTIHX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FTIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZAEX vs. FTIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z (FZAEX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FZAEXFTIHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.34

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

2.45

+1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.25

9.46

+5.79

FZAEX vs. FTIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZAEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the FTIHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZAEX and FTIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FZAEX vs. FTIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZAEX drawdown since its inception was -41.73%, which is greater than FTIHX's maximum drawdown of -35.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAEX and FTIHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZAEXFTIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.73%

-35.75%

-5.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.71%

-11.25%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-13.15%

-5.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.45%

-29.99%

-9.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.73%

-35.75%

-5.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.27%

-2.74%

-2.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.35%

-7.18%

-5.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

2.91%

+0.69%

Volatility

FZAEX vs. FTIHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z (FZAEX) has a higher volatility of 11.56% compared to Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) at 6.87%. This indicates that FZAEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZAEXFTIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.56%

6.87%

+4.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.50%

13.53%

+4.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.54%

15.49%

+5.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.44%

15.51%

+3.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.01%

15.95%

+3.06%

FZAEX vs. FTIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZAEX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FTIHX's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FZAEX vs. FTIHX - Dividend Comparison

FZAEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than FTIHX's 2.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
2.47%2.78%2.88%2.78%2.51%2.55%1.62%2.61%2.21%0.45%0.47%0.00%
FZAEX
Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z
1.30%1.65%1.36%1.69%1.23%5.35%2.23%11.13%0.78%0.10%0.63%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


FZAEX and FTIHX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FZAEX has higher volatility (11.56%) compared to FTIHX (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZAEX dropped -41.73% vs FTIHX's -35.75%.

FZAEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZAEX and FTIHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer