PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZAEX vs. FEMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZAEX vs. FEMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z (FZAEX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZAEX achieves a 31.44% return, which is significantly lower than FEMSX's 33.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FZAEX having a 13.49% annualized return and FEMSX not far ahead at 13.63%.


FZAEX

1D
-0.09%
1M
6.35%
YTD
31.44%
6M
32.63%
1Y
64.35%
3Y*
28.15%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
13.49%

FEMSX

1D
0.30%
1M
7.24%
YTD
33.43%
6M
35.29%
1Y
62.63%
3Y*
28.29%
5Y*
8.98%
10Y*
13.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZAEX vs. FEMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FZAEX
Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z
31.44%40.25%9.43%8.60%-19.75%-2.50%30.63%29.94%-17.95%46.69%
FEMSX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
33.43%37.92%7.84%14.23%-23.95%-5.14%24.72%28.87%-16.20%49.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FZAEX and FEMSX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2013

0.96

The correlation between FZAEX and FEMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZAEX vs. FEMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZAEX
FZAEX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FZAEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZAEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZAEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FZAEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZAEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FEMSX
FEMSX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FEMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FEMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZAEX vs. FEMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z (FZAEX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FZAEXFEMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.56

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.75

4.76

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.24

17.89

+0.36

FZAEX vs. FEMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZAEX Sharpe Ratio is 3.25, which is comparable to the FEMSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZAEX and FEMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FZAEX vs. FEMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZAEX drawdown since its inception was -41.73%, smaller than the maximum FEMSX drawdown of -44.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZAEX and FEMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZAEXFEMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.73%

-44.16%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.71%

-13.42%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-17.04%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.45%

-41.64%

+2.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.73%

-44.16%

+2.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

-0.18%

-1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.36%

-13.38%

+1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

3.56%

0.00%

Volatility

FZAEX vs. FEMSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z (FZAEX) is 10.58%, while Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) has a volatility of 11.28%. This indicates that FZAEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZAEXFEMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.58%

11.28%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.91%

19.22%

-1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.06%

21.38%

-1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.34%

19.54%

-0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.01%

19.56%

-0.55%

FZAEX vs. FEMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZAEX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FEMSX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FZAEX vs. FEMSX - Dividend Comparison

FZAEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than FEMSX's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEMSX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
1.83%2.45%2.08%2.82%2.39%12.83%2.99%2.48%9.42%8.98%1.46%1.27%
FZAEX
Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class Z
1.26%1.65%1.36%1.69%1.23%5.35%2.23%11.13%0.78%0.10%0.63%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FZAEX and FEMSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FEMSX has higher volatility (11.28%) compared to FZAEX (10.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZAEX dropped -41.73% vs FEMSX's -44.16%.

FZAEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 2.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZAEX and FEMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer