FYTKX vs. LTINX
FYTKX (Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K6) and LTINX (Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, FYTKX returned 3.41%/yr vs 4.60%/yr for LTINX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FYTKX charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for LTINX.
Performance
FYTKX vs. LTINX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FYTKX achieves a 5.02% return, which is significantly higher than LTINX's 3.69% return.
FYTKX
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 5.02%
- 6M
- 5.00%
- 1Y
- 10.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.21%
- 5Y*
- 3.41%
- 10Y*
- —
LTINX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 3.69%
- 6M
- 3.52%
- 1Y
- 10.05%
- 3Y*
- 10.09%
- 5Y*
- 4.60%
- 10Y*
- 6.63%
FYTKX vs. LTINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYTKX Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K6 | 5.02% | 10.61% | 4.60% | 8.42% | -11.23% | 3.25% | 9.07% | 10.71% | -1.84% | 3.46% |
LTINX Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund | 3.69% | 10.61% | 10.67% | 11.15% | -13.61% | 7.41% | 11.87% | 16.32% | -4.72% | 5.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between FYTKX and LTINX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017 | 0.84 |
The correlation between FYTKX and LTINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FYTKX vs. LTINX — Risk / Return Rank
FYTKX
LTINX
FYTKX vs. LTINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K6 (FYTKX) and Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FYTKX | LTINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.37 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 2.47 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.30 | 10.80 | +2.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FYTKX vs. LTINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FYTKX drawdown since its inception was -15.80%, smaller than the maximum LTINX drawdown of -44.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYTKX and LTINX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FYTKX | LTINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.80% | -44.03% | +28.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.67% | -4.29% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.85% | -6.16% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.80% | -18.54% | +2.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -0.44% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.86% | -5.17% | +2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 0.98% | -0.13% |
Volatility
FYTKX vs. LTINX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K6 (FYTKX) and Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX) have volatilities of 2.28% and 2.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FYTKX | LTINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.28% | 2.30% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.34% | 4.61% | -0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.97% | 5.52% | -0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.41% | 7.38% | -1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.80% | 7.36% | -2.56% |
FYTKX vs. LTINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FYTKX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than LTINX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
FYTKX vs. LTINX - Dividend Comparison
FYTKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, less than LTINX's 18.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYTKX Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K6 | 3.17% | 3.53% | 3.38% | 3.13% | 6.05% | 6.26% | 4.48% | 3.80% | 5.33% | 2.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LTINX Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund | 18.99% | 11.91% | 10.80% | 4.75% | 7.98% | 8.21% | 5.51% | 12.76% | 9.62% | 7.62% | 3.63% | 8.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, FYTKX and LTINX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
LTINX has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to FYTKX (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYTKX dropped -15.80% vs LTINX's -44.03%.
FYTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FYTKX and LTINX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer