PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FYTKX vs. LTINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FYTKX vs. LTINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K6 (FYTKX) and Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYTKX achieves a 5.02% return, which is significantly higher than LTINX's 3.69% return.


FYTKX

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.18%
YTD
5.02%
6M
5.00%
1Y
10.91%
3Y*
8.21%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*

LTINX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.74%
YTD
3.69%
6M
3.52%
1Y
10.05%
3Y*
10.09%
5Y*
4.60%
10Y*
6.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYTKX vs. LTINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FYTKX
Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K6
5.02%10.61%4.60%8.42%-11.23%3.25%9.07%10.71%-1.84%3.46%
LTINX
Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund
3.69%10.61%10.67%11.15%-13.61%7.41%11.87%16.32%-4.72%5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FYTKX and LTINX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.84

The correlation between FYTKX and LTINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FYTKX vs. LTINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYTKX
FYTKX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FYTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FYTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

LTINX
LTINX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
LTINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTINX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
LTINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTINX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYTKX vs. LTINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K6 (FYTKX) and Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FYTKXLTINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.37

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

2.47

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.30

10.80

+2.50

FYTKX vs. LTINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYTKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the LTINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYTKX and LTINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FYTKX vs. LTINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYTKX drawdown since its inception was -15.80%, smaller than the maximum LTINX drawdown of -44.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYTKX and LTINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FYTKXLTINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.80%

-44.03%

+28.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.67%

-4.29%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.85%

-6.16%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.80%

-18.54%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-0.44%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.86%

-5.17%

+2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

0.98%

-0.13%

Volatility

FYTKX vs. LTINX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K6 (FYTKX) and Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX) have volatilities of 2.28% and 2.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FYTKXLTINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.28%

2.30%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.34%

4.61%

-0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.97%

5.52%

-0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.41%

7.38%

-1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.80%

7.36%

-2.56%

FYTKX vs. LTINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYTKX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than LTINX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FYTKX vs. LTINX - Dividend Comparison

FYTKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, less than LTINX's 18.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYTKX
Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K6
3.17%3.53%3.38%3.13%6.05%6.26%4.48%3.80%5.33%2.65%0.00%0.00%
LTINX
Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund
18.99%11.91%10.80%4.75%7.98%8.21%5.51%12.76%9.62%7.62%3.63%8.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FYTKX and LTINX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LTINX has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to FYTKX (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYTKX dropped -15.80% vs LTINX's -44.03%.

FYTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FYTKX and LTINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer