FYT vs. ISCV
FYT (First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) and ISCV (iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds - FYT tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Value Index while ISCV tracks the Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Value Extended Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FYT returned 9.99%/yr vs 8.58%/yr for ISCV. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FYT charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for ISCV.
Performance
FYT vs. ISCV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FYT achieves a 15.42% return, which is significantly higher than ISCV's 10.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FYT has outperformed ISCV with an annualized return of 9.99%, while ISCV has yielded a comparatively lower 8.58% annualized return.
FYT
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- YTD
- 15.42%
- 6M
- 14.14%
- 1Y
- 34.20%
- 3Y*
- 15.03%
- 5Y*
- 5.74%
- 10Y*
- 9.99%
ISCV
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 10.08%
- 6M
- 10.27%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 15.48%
- 5Y*
- 6.54%
- 10Y*
- 8.58%
FYT vs. ISCV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYT First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 15.42% | 4.00% | 3.24% | 22.90% | -14.05% | 29.33% | 9.82% | 25.80% | -14.73% | 7.14% |
ISCV iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF | 10.08% | 10.38% | 9.31% | 16.55% | -10.58% | 29.15% | 0.86% | 19.51% | -17.39% | 8.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between FYT and ISCV is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2011 | 0.90 |
The correlation between FYT and ISCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
FYT vs. ISCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FYT
ISCV
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Real Estate
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
FYT
ISCV
Consumer Cyclical
FYT
ISCV
Industrials
FYT
ISCV
Real Estate
FYT
ISCV
Technology
FYT
ISCV
Consumer Defensive
FYT
ISCV
Energy
FYT
ISCV
Healthcare
FYT
ISCV
Basic Materials
FYT
ISCV
Communication Services
FYT
ISCV
Utilities
FYT
ISCV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FYT vs. ISCV — Risk / Return Rank
FYT
ISCV
FYT vs. ISCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT) and iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FYT | ISCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.30 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.12 | 3.04 | +1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.64 | 10.55 | +1.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FYT | ISCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 1.73 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.32 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.37 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.36 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
FYT vs. ISCV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FYT drawdown since its inception was -50.48%, smaller than the maximum ISCV drawdown of -63.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYT and ISCV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FYT | ISCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.48% | -63.14% | +12.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -9.25% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.90% | -25.35% | -3.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.90% | -25.35% | -3.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.48% | -51.56% | +1.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.65% | -0.68% | -1.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.54% | -9.14% | +0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 2.66% | +0.29% |
Volatility
FYT vs. ISCV - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FYT) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV) at 3.80%. This indicates that FYT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FYT | ISCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.66% | 3.80% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.62% | 10.45% | +1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.90% | 16.28% | +2.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.56% | 20.83% | +1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.96% | 23.30% | +2.66% |
FYT vs. ISCV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FYT has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCV's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
FYT vs. ISCV - Dividend Comparison
FYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than ISCV's 1.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYT First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 1.12% | 0.94% | 2.07% | 1.50% | 1.36% | 1.19% | 0.96% | 1.44% | 1.78% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 0.96% |
ISCV iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF | 1.88% | 2.04% | 2.01% | 2.21% | 2.12% | 1.95% | 2.01% | 2.36% | 2.48% | 1.74% | 2.49% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, FYT and ISCV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FYT has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to ISCV (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYT dropped -50.48% vs ISCV's -63.14%.
On 10-year performance, FYT leads with 9.99% vs 8.58% for ISCV. On fees, ISCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, ISCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FYT has performed better with a 9.99% return vs 8.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for FYT.
ISCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 1.12% for FYT.
FYT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Value Index, while ISCV tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Value Extended Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for FYT and 0.06% for ISCV.
FYT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FYT and ISCV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer