PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FYLSX vs. PLTZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FYLSX vs. PLTZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2050 Fund (FYLSX) and Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYLSX achieves a 13.89% return, which is significantly higher than PLTZX's 9.67% return.


FYLSX

1D
0.66%
1M
5.39%
YTD
13.89%
6M
15.48%
1Y
30.98%
3Y*
22.03%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*

PLTZX

1D
0.44%
1M
4.72%
YTD
9.67%
6M
10.04%
1Y
22.84%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
9.32%
10Y*
11.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYLSX vs. PLTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FYLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2050 Fund
13.89%22.85%18.32%21.03%-18.70%16.96%18.37%25.95%-8.32%10.11%
PLTZX
Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund
9.67%17.76%16.89%20.36%-18.81%18.12%16.60%27.54%-9.24%11.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FYLSX and PLTZX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.97

The correlation between FYLSX and PLTZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FYLSX vs. PLTZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYLSX
FYLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FYLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FYLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTZX
PLTZX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PLTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYLSX vs. PLTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2050 Fund (FYLSX) and Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FYLSXPLTZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.37

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

2.68

+0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.71

12.08

+2.63

FYLSX vs. PLTZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYLSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the PLTZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYLSX and PLTZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FYLSXPLTZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

1.98

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.61

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.70

+0.08

Drawdowns

FYLSX vs. PLTZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYLSX drawdown since its inception was -31.26%, smaller than the maximum PLTZX drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYLSX and PLTZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FYLSXPLTZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.26%

-34.01%

+2.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.47%

-8.70%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.38%

-15.73%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.51%

-26.79%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-4.63%

-0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

1.93%

+0.21%

Volatility

FYLSX vs. PLTZX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2050 Fund (FYLSX) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX) at 3.30%. This indicates that FYLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FYLSXPLTZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

3.30%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.21%

9.44%

+0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.48%

11.80%

+0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.09%

15.46%

-0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

15.99%

+0.06%

FYLSX vs. PLTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYLSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTZX's 0.01% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FYLSX vs. PLTZX - Dividend Comparison

FYLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, less than PLTZX's 7.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2050 Fund
6.56%3.62%7.86%2.22%5.82%6.93%5.73%7.01%8.17%3.09%0.00%0.00%
PLTZX
Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund
7.60%8.33%7.85%4.12%8.44%5.29%3.60%5.86%5.75%2.73%3.48%3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FYLSX and PLTZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FYLSX has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to PLTZX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYLSX dropped -31.26% vs PLTZX's -34.01%.

FYLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FYLSX and PLTZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer