FYLD vs. VLUE
FYLD (Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF) and VLUE (iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FYLD is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while VLUE is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index. FYLD is actively managed, while VLUE is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FYLD returned 12.08%/yr vs 15.38%/yr for VLUE. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FYLD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VLUE.
Performance
FYLD vs. VLUE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FYLD achieves a 19.96% return, which is significantly lower than VLUE's 45.72% return. Over the past 10 years, FYLD has underperformed VLUE with an annualized return of 12.08%, while VLUE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.38% annualized return.
FYLD
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 19.96%
- 6M
- 20.90%
- 1Y
- 38.49%
- 3Y*
- 22.16%
- 5Y*
- 11.63%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
VLUE
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 7.90%
- YTD
- 45.72%
- 6M
- 46.53%
- 1Y
- 83.16%
- 3Y*
- 31.47%
- 5Y*
- 16.01%
- 10Y*
- 15.38%
FYLD vs. VLUE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 19.96% | 34.53% | 3.00% | 13.18% | -5.53% | 18.67% | 4.17% | 17.83% | -14.47% | 29.81% |
VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 45.72% | 32.67% | 7.25% | 14.26% | -14.17% | 28.93% | -0.23% | 27.20% | -11.13% | 21.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between FYLD and VLUE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2013 | 0.66 |
The correlation between FYLD and VLUE shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FYLD vs. VLUE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FYLD
VLUE
Energy
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
Utilities
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
FYLD
VLUE
Financial Services
FYLD
VLUE
Industrials
FYLD
VLUE
Basic Materials
FYLD
VLUE
Consumer Cyclical
FYLD
VLUE
Consumer Defensive
FYLD
VLUE
Technology
FYLD
VLUE
Communication Services
FYLD
VLUE
Utilities
FYLD
VLUE
Healthcare
FYLD
-
VLUE
Real Estate
FYLD
-
VLUE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FYLD vs. VLUE — Risk / Return Rank
FYLD
VLUE
FYLD vs. VLUE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FYLD | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.77 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.11 | 9.25 | -2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.06 | 39.16 | -14.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FYLD vs. VLUE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FYLD drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, which is greater than VLUE's maximum drawdown of -39.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYLD and VLUE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FYLD | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.55% | -39.47% | -5.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.44% | -9.04% | +3.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.15% | -17.89% | +2.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.12% | -27.12% | +2.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.55% | -39.47% | -5.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -2.61% | +2.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.81% | -6.01% | -2.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.54% | 2.13% | -0.59% |
Volatility
FYLD vs. VLUE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) is 3.71%, while iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) has a volatility of 8.83%. This indicates that FYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VLUE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FYLD | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 8.83% | -5.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.21% | 15.31% | -6.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.82% | 18.38% | -6.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.27% | 18.00% | -1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 19.91% | -1.90% |
FYLD vs. VLUE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VLUE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FYLD vs. VLUE - Dividend Comparison
FYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than VLUE's 1.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 3.60% | 4.07% | 5.41% | 6.06% | 6.13% | 4.74% | 3.94% | 3.73% | 5.17% | 2.85% | 2.72% | 3.98% |
VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 1.43% | 2.11% | 2.73% | 2.66% | 3.18% | 2.22% | 2.42% | 2.61% | 2.70% | 2.14% | 2.07% | 2.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FYLD and VLUE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VLUE has higher volatility (8.83%) compared to FYLD (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYLD dropped -44.55% vs VLUE's -39.47%.
On 10-year performance, VLUE leads with 15.38% vs 12.08% for FYLD. On fees, VLUE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VLUE has performed better with a 15.38% return vs 12.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VLUE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FYLD.
FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 1.43% for VLUE.
FYLD is categorized as Global Equities, while VLUE is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FYLD and 0.15% for VLUE.
VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.55 vs 3.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FYLD and VLUE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer