PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FYLD vs. SYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FYLD vs. SYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) and Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYLD achieves a 16.00% return, which is significantly higher than SYLD's 14.05% return. Over the past 10 years, FYLD has underperformed SYLD with an annualized return of 11.87%, while SYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.46% annualized return.


FYLD

1D
-1.30%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
16.00%
6M
16.03%
1Y
35.30%
3Y*
21.72%
5Y*
11.36%
10Y*
11.87%

SYLD

1D
0.10%
1M
0.04%
YTD
14.05%
6M
13.14%
1Y
24.78%
3Y*
12.54%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
13.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYLD vs. SYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FYLD
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF
16.00%34.53%3.00%13.18%-5.53%18.67%4.17%17.83%-14.47%29.81%
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
14.05%3.94%3.37%16.46%-6.14%48.59%13.61%26.98%-13.51%20.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FYLD and SYLD is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2013

0.66

The correlation between FYLD and SYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FYLD vs. SYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FYLD
SYLD

Energy

29.3%
17.1%

Financial Services

20.7%
22.7%

Industrials

16.2%
8.3%

Basic Materials

9.5%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
23.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
6.7%

Communication Services

3.8%
6.0%

Technology

3.5%
2.1%

Utilities

1.6%

-

Healthcare

-

5.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Energy

FYLD
29.3%
SYLD
17.1%

Financial Services

FYLD
20.7%
SYLD
22.7%

Industrials

FYLD
16.2%
SYLD
8.3%

Basic Materials

FYLD
9.5%
SYLD
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FYLD
8.6%
SYLD
23.5%

Consumer Defensive

FYLD
5.5%
SYLD
6.7%

Communication Services

FYLD
3.8%
SYLD
6.0%

Technology

FYLD
3.5%
SYLD
2.1%

Utilities

FYLD
1.6%
SYLD

-

Healthcare

FYLD

-

SYLD
5.7%

Real Estate

FYLD

-

SYLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FYLD vs. SYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYLD
FYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SYLD
SYLD Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYLD vs. SYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) and Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FYLDSYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.28

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.52

3.59

+2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.40

9.63

+12.78

FYLD vs. SYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is higher than the SYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYLD and SYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FYLD vs. SYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYLD drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, roughly equal to the maximum SYLD drawdown of -45.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYLD and SYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FYLDSYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.55%

-45.36%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.44%

-6.93%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.15%

-26.62%

+11.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.12%

-26.62%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.55%

-45.36%

+0.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.62%

-2.68%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.80%

-5.65%

-3.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

2.58%

-1.00%

Volatility

FYLD vs. SYLD - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) at 3.51%. This indicates that FYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FYLDSYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

3.51%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.44%

9.79%

-0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.04%

15.62%

-3.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

20.47%

-4.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.83%

22.94%

-5.11%

FYLD vs. SYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FYLD and SYLD have an expense ratio of 0.59%.


Dividends

FYLD vs. SYLD - Dividend Comparison

FYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than SYLD's 1.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYLD
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF
3.47%4.07%5.41%6.06%6.13%4.74%3.94%3.73%5.17%2.85%2.72%3.98%
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
1.85%2.25%2.04%1.92%2.20%2.37%1.99%2.08%2.52%1.57%1.92%6.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


FYLD and SYLD have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FYLD has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to SYLD (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYLD dropped -44.55% vs SYLD's -45.36%.

On 10-year performance, SYLD leads with 13.46% vs 11.87% for FYLD. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, SYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SYLD has performed better with a 13.46% return vs 11.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FYLD and SYLD have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 1.85% for SYLD.

FYLD is categorized as Global Equities, while SYLD is Mid Cap Value Equities.

FYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FYLD and SYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer