FYLD vs. CAPE
FYLD (Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF) and CAPE (DoubleLine Shiller CAPE U.S. Equities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FYLD is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while CAPE is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by DoubleLine. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FYLD returned 21.91%/yr vs 11.67%/yr for CAPE. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FYLD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CAPE.
Performance
FYLD vs. CAPE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FYLD achieves a 21.93% return, which is significantly higher than CAPE's 4.09% return.
FYLD
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- 6M
- 9.35%
- YTD
- 21.93%
- 1Y
- 35.40%
- 3Y*
- 21.91%
- 5Y*
- 12.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.32%
CAPE
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 4.09%
- 1Y
- 6.68%
- 3Y*
- 11.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $395.56K | $459.56K | $918.47K | |
| $1.76M | $1.76M | $3.02M |
FYLD vs. CAPE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 21.93% | 34.53% | 3.00% | 13.18% | -7.63% |
CAPE DoubleLine Shiller CAPE U.S. Equities ETF | 4.09% | 9.10% | 14.40% | 27.65% | -15.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between FYLD and CAPE is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2022 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FYLD and CAPE has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FYLD vs. CAPE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FYLD
CAPE
Energy
-
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
FYLD
CAPE
-
Financial Services
FYLD
CAPE
Industrials
FYLD
CAPE
Consumer Cyclical
FYLD
CAPE
Basic Materials
FYLD
CAPE
Consumer Defensive
FYLD
CAPE
Communication Services
FYLD
CAPE
Utilities
FYLD
CAPE
-
Technology
FYLD
CAPE
Healthcare
FYLD
-
CAPE
Real Estate
FYLD
-
CAPE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FYLD vs. CAPE — Risk / Return Rank
FYLD
CAPE
FYLD vs. CAPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) and DoubleLine Shiller CAPE U.S. Equities ETF (CAPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FYLD | CAPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.11 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.27 | 0.69 | +5.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.10 | 2.44 | +16.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FYLD vs. CAPE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FYLD drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, which is greater than CAPE's maximum drawdown of -22.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYLD and CAPE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FYLD | CAPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.55% | -22.07% | -22.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.67% | -9.68% | +4.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.15% | -14.32% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | 0.00% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.74% | -4.80% | -3.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 2.74% | -0.88% |
Volatility
FYLD vs. CAPE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) is 2.90%, while DoubleLine Shiller CAPE U.S. Equities ETF (CAPE) has a volatility of 4.38%. This indicates that FYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAPE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FYLD | CAPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 4.38% | -1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.29% | 9.62% | -0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.03% | 11.55% | +0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 16.83% | -0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.75% | 16.83% | +0.92% |
FYLD vs. CAPE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CAPE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
FYLD vs. CAPE - Dividend Comparison
FYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, more than CAPE's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAPE DoubleLine Shiller CAPE U.S. Equities ETF | 1.35% | 1.39% | 1.23% | 1.01% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 3.31% | 4.07% | 5.41% | 6.06% | 6.13% | 4.74% | 3.94% | 3.73% | 5.17% | 2.85% | 2.72% | 3.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FYLD and CAPE have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAPE has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to FYLD (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYLD dropped -44.55% vs CAPE's -22.07%.
On 3-year performance, FYLD leads with 21.91% vs 11.67% for CAPE. On fees, FYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FYLD has performed better with a 21.91% return vs 11.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CAPE.
FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 1.35% for CAPE.
FYLD is categorized as Global Equities, while CAPE is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FYLD and 0.65% for CAPE.
FYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FYLD and CAPE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer