FYHTX vs. FCGCX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FYHTX (Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund) and FCGCX (Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C) are both Commodities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FYHTX returned 9.78%/yr vs 12.05%/yr for FCGCX. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FYHTX charges 0.63%/yr vs 1.97%/yr for FCGCX.

Performance

FYHTX vs. FCGCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX) and Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C (FCGCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYHTX achieves a 20.27% return, which is significantly lower than FCGCX's 22.54% return.

FYHTX

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: -0.45%
• YTD: 20.27%
• 6M: 20.66%
• 1Y: 31.28%
• 3Y*: 13.63%
• 5Y*: 9.78%
• 10Y*: —

FCGCX

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: -0.18%
• YTD: 22.54%
• 6M: 26.68%
• 1Y: 48.59%
• 3Y*: 18.38%
• 5Y*: 12.05%
• 10Y*: 11.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYHTX vs. FCGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FYHTX Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund	20.27%	14.72%	4.73%	-8.62%	15.32%	26.43%	-3.84%	6.91%	-11.71%	6.00%
FCGCX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C	22.54%	27.29%	1.90%	-6.06%	19.45%	24.85%	4.96%	16.74%	-14.07%	17.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FYHTX and FCGCX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2017	0.60

The correlation between FYHTX and FCGCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FYHTX vs. FCGCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYHTX

FYHTX Risk / Return Rank: 68
FYHTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FYHTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
FYHTX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FYHTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FYHTX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

FCGCX

FCGCX Risk / Return Rank: 89
FCGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FCGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FCGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FCGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FCGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYHTX vs. FCGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX) and Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C (FCGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FYHTX	FCGCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.45	3.10	-0.65
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	3.92	-0.76
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.52	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.59	6.62	-2.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.00	23.79	-11.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FYHTX vs. FCGCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYHTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the FCGCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYHTX and FCGCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FYHTX	FCGCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.45	3.10	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	0.57	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.30	+0.19

Drawdowns

FYHTX vs. FCGCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYHTX drawdown since its inception was -33.22%, smaller than the maximum FCGCX drawdown of -59.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYHTX and FCGCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FYHTX	FCGCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.22%	-59.67%	+26.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.22%	-7.45%	+0.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.52%	-19.96%	+8.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.47%	-27.43%	+1.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-49.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.70%	-2.86%	-0.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.95%	-21.21%	+9.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.76%	2.07%	+0.69%

Volatility

FYHTX vs. FCGCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C (FCGCX) at 4.26%. This indicates that FYHTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCGCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FYHTX	FCGCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.52%	4.26%	+0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.59%	13.28%	-1.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.14%	16.35%	-2.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.85%	21.37%	-5.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.48%	22.43%	-7.95%

FYHTX vs. FCGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYHTX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than FCGCX's 1.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

FYHTX vs. FCGCX - Dividend Comparison

FYHTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than FCGCX's 1.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCGCX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class C	1.21%	1.48%	1.38%	0.80%	1.09%	2.41%	0.59%	1.94%	1.11%	0.36%	0.71%	1.49%
FYHTX Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund	2.44%	2.93%	3.78%	4.10%	57.34%	15.05%	0.00%	7.00%	12.49%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FYHTX and FCGCX in my portfolio?

FYHTX and FCGCX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FYHTX or FCGCX?

FYHTX has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to FCGCX (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYHTX dropped -33.22% vs FCGCX's -59.67%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.