FYEE vs. XYLD
FYEE (Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF) and XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. FYEE is actively managed, while XYLD is passively managed. Over the past year, FYEE returned 24.64% vs 17.66% for XYLD. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FYEE charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XYLD.
Performance
FYEE vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FYEE achieves a 7.03% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD's 4.96% return.
FYEE
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 3.22%
- YTD
- 7.03%
- 6M
- 8.52%
- 1Y
- 24.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XYLD
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 4.96%
- 6M
- 6.48%
- 1Y
- 17.66%
- 3Y*
- 11.27%
- 5Y*
- 7.72%
- 10Y*
- 8.25%
FYEE vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FYEE Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF | 7.03% | 15.76% | 13.20% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 4.96% | 8.02% | 12.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between FYEE and XYLD is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2024 | 0.84 |
The correlation between FYEE and XYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FYEE vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank
FYEE
XYLD
FYEE vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF (FYEE) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FYEE | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.64 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 3.35 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.14 | 17.84 | -0.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FYEE | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 2.71 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.24 | 0.60 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
FYEE vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FYEE drawdown since its inception was -18.79%, smaller than the maximum XYLD drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYEE and XYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FYEE | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.79% | -33.46% | +14.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.39% | -5.29% | -2.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -0.15% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.25% | -3.72% | +1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.44% | 0.99% | +0.45% |
Volatility
FYEE vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF (FYEE) has a higher volatility of 1.43% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 0.88%. This indicates that FYEE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FYEE | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.43% | 0.88% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.26% | 5.37% | +1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.64% | 6.55% | +3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.84% | 11.22% | +2.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.84% | 14.21% | -0.37% |
FYEE vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FYEE has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FYEE vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison
FYEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, less than XYLD's 10.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYEE Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF | 7.57% | 7.08% | 5.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 10.52% | 10.51% | 11.54% | 10.51% | 13.43% | 9.07% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 5.18% | 3.23% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FYEE and XYLD have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FYEE has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to XYLD (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYEE dropped -18.79% vs XYLD's -33.46%.
On 1-year performance, FYEE leads with 24.64% vs 17.66% for XYLD. On fees, FYEE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FYEE has performed better with a 24.64% return vs 17.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FYEE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.
XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.52%, compared with 7.57% for FYEE.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for FYEE and 0.60% for XYLD.
XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FYEE and XYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer