FYC vs. MMSC
FYC (First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund) and MMSC (First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds from First Trust. FYC is passively managed, while MMSC is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FYC returned 26.12%/yr vs 22.52%/yr for MMSC. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FYC charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for MMSC.
Performance
FYC vs. MMSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FYC achieves a 20.01% return, which is significantly higher than MMSC's 17.91% return.
FYC
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- 20.01%
- 6M
- 20.96%
- 1Y
- 53.40%
- 3Y*
- 26.12%
- 5Y*
- 10.47%
- 10Y*
- 14.30%
MMSC
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 5.15%
- YTD
- 17.91%
- 6M
- 17.19%
- 1Y
- 42.14%
- 3Y*
- 22.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FYC vs. MMSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYC First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | 20.01% | 24.24% | 23.99% | 14.52% | -25.86% | 2.29% |
MMSC First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF | 17.91% | 15.45% | 22.19% | 18.76% | -30.98% | 1.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between FYC and MMSC is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2021 | 0.95 |
The correlation between FYC and MMSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
FYC vs. MMSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FYC
MMSC
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Healthcare
FYC
MMSC
Technology
FYC
MMSC
Industrials
FYC
MMSC
Financial Services
FYC
MMSC
Consumer Cyclical
FYC
MMSC
Real Estate
FYC
MMSC
Consumer Defensive
FYC
MMSC
Basic Materials
FYC
MMSC
Communication Services
FYC
MMSC
Energy
FYC
MMSC
Utilities
FYC
MMSC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FYC vs. MMSC — Risk / Return Rank
FYC
MMSC
FYC vs. MMSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) and First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FYC | MMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.32 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.12 | 3.00 | +2.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.64 | 11.46 | +7.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FYC | MMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | 1.90 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.29 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
FYC vs. MMSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FYC drawdown since its inception was -47.85%, which is greater than MMSC's maximum drawdown of -40.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYC and MMSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FYC | MMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.85% | -40.82% | -7.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.48% | -14.10% | +3.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.79% | -29.76% | +1.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -0.70% | -1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -18.78% | +9.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 3.69% | -0.82% |
Volatility
FYC vs. MMSC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) is 5.53%, while First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC) has a volatility of 6.69%. This indicates that FYC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FYC | MMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.53% | 6.69% | -1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.99% | 17.11% | -2.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.03% | 22.35% | -1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.62% | 24.46% | -0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.57% | 24.46% | +0.11% |
FYC vs. MMSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FYC has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than MMSC's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FYC vs. MMSC - Dividend Comparison
FYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while MMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYC First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | 0.07% | 0.08% | 0.72% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.63% | 0.12% | 0.39% | 0.09% | 0.10% | 0.31% | 0.21% |
MMSC First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, FYC and MMSC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MMSC has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to FYC (5.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYC dropped -47.85% vs MMSC's -40.82%.
On 3-year performance, FYC leads with 26.12% vs 22.52% for MMSC. On fees, FYC is cheaper at 0.71% per year. On volatility, FYC has been the lower-risk option at 5.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FYC has performed better with a 26.12% return vs 22.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FYC is cheaper with a 0.71% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MMSC.
FYC has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for MMSC.
Their fees differ too: 0.71% for FYC and 0.95% for MMSC.
FYC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FYC and MMSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer