PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXU vs. RSPU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXU vs. RSPU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXU achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly higher than RSPU's 4.83% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FXU having a 9.21% annualized return and RSPU not far ahead at 9.39%.


FXU

1D
-0.04%
1M
-3.16%
YTD
6.16%
6M
5.04%
1Y
13.42%
3Y*
17.52%
5Y*
11.68%
10Y*
9.21%

RSPU

1D
-0.25%
1M
-4.29%
YTD
4.83%
6M
3.78%
1Y
10.96%
3Y*
15.70%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
9.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXU vs. RSPU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXU
First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund
6.16%21.86%22.50%-2.12%3.68%17.67%1.53%11.67%5.43%0.98%
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
4.83%16.82%23.57%-3.45%4.37%17.13%-2.70%22.94%6.89%9.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FXU and RSPU is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007

0.87

The correlation between FXU and RSPU shifts across timeframes, from 0.87 (all time) to 0.98 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FXU vs. RSPU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXU
RSPU

Utilities

92.0%
100.0%

Industrials

4.2%

-

Energy

3.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

FXU
92.0%
RSPU
100.0%

Industrials

FXU
4.2%
RSPU

-

Energy

FXU
3.7%
RSPU

-

Basic Materials

FXU

-

RSPU

-

Communication Services

FXU

-

RSPU

-

Consumer Cyclical

FXU

-

RSPU

-

Consumer Defensive

FXU

-

RSPU

-

Financial Services

FXU

-

RSPU

-

Healthcare

FXU

-

RSPU

-

Real Estate

FXU

-

RSPU

-

Technology

FXU

-

RSPU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXU vs. RSPU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXU
FXU Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXU Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXU Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

RSPU
RSPU Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
RSPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPU Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPU Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXU vs. RSPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXURSPUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.14

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

1.30

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.43

3.04

+1.38

FXU vs. RSPU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXU Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the RSPU Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXU and RSPU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXURSPUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

0.79

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.64

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.49

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.47

-0.05

Drawdowns

FXU vs. RSPU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXU drawdown since its inception was -49.00%, roughly equal to the maximum RSPU drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXU and RSPU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXURSPUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.00%

-48.08%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.63%

-8.46%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.46%

-16.27%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.87%

-21.86%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.81%

-36.85%

+2.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.34%

-7.15%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

-7.85%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

3.63%

-0.56%

Volatility

FXU vs. RSPU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) is 4.65%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that FXU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXURSPUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

5.21%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

10.93%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.17%

13.98%

-0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.58%

16.92%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

19.09%

-0.76%

FXU vs. RSPU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXU has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPU's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXU vs. RSPU - Dividend Comparison

FXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than RSPU's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXU
First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund
2.20%2.29%2.41%2.52%2.03%2.00%3.97%2.34%2.40%3.81%2.62%3.90%
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
2.54%2.54%2.39%2.92%2.35%2.41%2.94%2.54%3.11%3.08%2.98%4.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FXU and RSPU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RSPU has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to FXU (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXU dropped -49.00% vs RSPU's -48.08%.

On 10-year performance, RSPU leads with 9.39% vs 9.21% for FXU. On fees, RSPU is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, FXU has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RSPU has performed better with a 9.39% return vs 9.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSPU is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for FXU.

RSPU has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 2.20% for FXU.

FXU tracks StrataQuant Utilities Index, while RSPU tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Utilities Plus. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for FXU and 0.40% for RSPU.

FXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXU and RSPU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer