PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXR vs. PRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXR vs. PRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXR achieves a 10.80% return, which is significantly lower than PRN's 28.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FXR has underperformed PRN with an annualized return of 12.78%, while PRN has yielded a comparatively higher 16.81% annualized return.


FXR

1D
-0.77%
1M
0.66%
6M
2.93%
YTD
10.80%
1Y
15.70%
3Y*
14.01%
5Y*
9.30%
10Y*
12.78%

PRN

1D
-2.58%
1M
-8.24%
6M
18.73%
YTD
28.56%
1Y
43.53%
3Y*
28.59%
5Y*
18.48%
10Y*
16.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXR vs. PRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXR
First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund
10.80%7.56%16.19%26.98%-16.68%25.07%12.82%33.42%-15.12%24.20%
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
28.56%13.74%30.35%37.96%-25.09%25.21%36.39%34.52%-16.19%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FXR and PRN is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007

0.81

The correlation between FXR and PRN shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FXR vs. PRN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXR
PRN

Industrials

68.3%
65.7%

Technology

10.3%
22.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
1.5%

Basic Materials

7.6%
1.8%

Financial Services

3.4%
1.2%

Healthcare

0.7%

-

Utilities

0.7%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

1.6%

Real Estate

-

2.0%

Industrials

FXR
68.3%
PRN
65.7%

Technology

FXR
10.3%
PRN
22.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FXR
8.3%
PRN
1.5%

Basic Materials

FXR
7.6%
PRN
1.8%

Financial Services

FXR
3.4%
PRN
1.2%

Healthcare

FXR
0.7%
PRN

-

Utilities

FXR
0.7%
PRN

-

Communication Services

FXR

-

PRN

-

Consumer Defensive

FXR

-

PRN

-

Energy

FXR

-

PRN
1.6%

Real Estate

FXR

-

PRN
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXR vs. PRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXR
FXR Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXR Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXR Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

PRN
PRN Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXR vs. PRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXRPRNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.24

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

3.01

-1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.57

9.10

-5.53

FXR vs. PRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXR Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the PRN Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXR and PRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXR vs. PRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXR drawdown since its inception was -63.81%, which is greater than PRN's maximum drawdown of -59.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXR and PRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXRPRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.81%

-59.88%

-3.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.66%

-14.55%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.65%

-30.78%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.85%

-34.84%

+7.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.71%

-36.27%

-8.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.29%

-14.55%

+11.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.31%

-10.81%

+0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.41%

4.80%

-0.39%

Volatility

FXR vs. PRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) is 5.94%, while Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a volatility of 13.86%. This indicates that FXR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXRPRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.94%

13.86%

-7.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.11%

26.01%

-10.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.65%

32.16%

-12.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.70%

25.80%

-5.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.86%

24.58%

-2.72%

FXR vs. PRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXR has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than PRN's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXR vs. PRN - Dividend Comparison

FXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, more than PRN's 0.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXR
First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund
0.66%0.71%0.72%0.77%0.92%0.52%1.06%0.74%1.18%0.55%0.52%0.62%
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
0.09%0.17%0.39%0.52%0.82%0.11%0.10%0.42%0.29%0.60%0.57%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXR and PRN have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRN has higher volatility (13.86%) compared to FXR (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXR dropped -63.81% vs PRN's -59.88%.

On 10-year performance, PRN leads with 16.81% vs 12.78% for FXR. On fees, PRN is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FXR has been the lower-risk option at 5.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PRN has performed better with a 16.81% return vs 12.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PRN is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FXR.

FXR has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.09% for PRN.

FXR is categorized as Industrials Equities, while PRN is Momentum. FXR tracks StrataQuant Industrials Index, while PRN tracks DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FXR and 0.60% for PRN.

PRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXR and PRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer