FXO vs. FBDC
FXO (First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund) and FBDC (FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF) are both Financials Equities funds from First Trust. FXO is passively managed, while FBDC is actively managed. Over the past year, FXO returned 20.77% vs -7.42% for FBDC. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FXO charges 0.62%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for FBDC.
Performance
FXO vs. FBDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXO achieves a 12.28% return, which is significantly higher than FBDC's -3.55% return.
FXO
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 4.66%
- 6M
- 10.72%
- YTD
- 12.28%
- 1Y
- 20.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.44%
- 10Y*
- 13.29%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.63%
FBDC
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- -3.55%
- 1Y
- -7.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -5.61%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $236.15K | $201.18K | $193.83K | |
| $3.33M | $3.32M | $3.46M |
FXO vs. FBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FXO First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund | 12.28% | 9.56% |
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF | -3.55% | -2.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXO and FBDC is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025 | 0.56 |
The correlation between FXO and FBDC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXO vs. FBDC — Risk / Return Rank
FXO
FBDC
FXO vs. FBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund (FXO) and FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXO | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.95 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | -0.41 | +2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.33 | -0.73 | +6.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXO vs. FBDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXO drawdown since its inception was -71.30%, which is greater than FBDC's maximum drawdown of -20.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXO and FBDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXO | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.30% | -20.60% | -50.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.72% | -18.08% | +6.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -11.79% | +11.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -10.92% | -2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.91% | 10.16% | -6.25% |
Volatility
FXO vs. FBDC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund (FXO) is 4.15%, while FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that FXO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXO | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 5.49% | -1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.07% | 14.77% | -3.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.51% | 18.37% | -2.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.72% | 17.96% | +3.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.06% | 17.96% | +6.10% |
FXO vs. FBDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXO has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than FBDC's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXO vs. FBDC - Dividend Comparison
FXO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than FBDC's 11.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF | 11.88% | 5.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXO First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund | 1.95% | 1.78% | 1.97% | 2.98% | 2.49% | 1.91% | 2.60% | 1.72% | 2.60% | 1.62% | 1.35% | 1.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXO and FBDC have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBDC has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to FXO (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXO dropped -71.30% vs FBDC's -20.60%.
On 1-year performance, FXO leads with 20.77% vs -7.42% for FBDC. On fees, FXO is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, FXO has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FXO has performed better with a 20.77% return vs -7.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FXO is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for FBDC.
FBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.88%, compared with 1.95% for FXO.
Their fees differ too: 0.62% for FXO and 1.35% for FBDC.
FXO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXO and FBDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer