FBDC vs. FDFF

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

FBDC (FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF) and FDFF (Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FBDC returned -7.42% vs -2.70% for FDFF. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FBDC charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FDFF.

Performance

FBDC vs. FDFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC) and Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBDC achieves a -3.55% return, which is significantly lower than FDFF's 3.29% return.

FBDC

• 1D: 1.71%
• 1M: 3.54%
• 6M: 1.08%
• YTD: -3.55%
• 1Y: -7.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -5.61%

FDFF

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: 6.39%
• 6M: 9.26%
• YTD: 3.29%
• 1Y: -2.70%
• 3Y*: 12.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF	$236.15K	$201.18K	$193.83K
FDFF Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF	$120.17K	$153.81K	$132.86K

FBDC vs. FDFF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF	-3.55%	-2.66%
FDFF Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF	3.29%	-5.48%

Correlation

The correlation between FBDC and FDFF is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025	0.59

The correlation between FBDC and FDFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FBDC vs. FDFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FBDC

FBDC Risk / Return Rank: 6
FBDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
FBDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
FBDC Omega Ratio Rank: 6
FBDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
FBDC Martin Ratio Rank: 6

FDFF

FDFF Risk / Return Rank: 8
FDFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
FDFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
FDFF Omega Ratio Rank: 8
FDFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
FDFF Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FBDC vs. FDFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC) and Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBDC	FDFF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.41	-0.15	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.47	-0.08	-0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	0.99	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.41	-0.13	-0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.73	-0.26	-0.47

FBDC vs. FDFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBDC Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the FDFF Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBDC and FDFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FBDC vs. FDFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBDC drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, smaller than the maximum FDFF drawdown of -23.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBDC and FDFF.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBDC	FDFF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.60%	-23.06%	+2.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.08%	-20.60%	+2.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.79%	-6.19%	-5.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.92%	-6.66%	-4.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.16%	10.27%	-0.11%

Volatility

FBDC vs. FDFF - Volatility Comparison

FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF) at 4.84%. This indicates that FBDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBDC	FDFF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.49%	4.84%	+0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.77%	14.93%	-0.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.37%	18.62%	-0.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.96%	18.95%	-0.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.96%	18.95%	-0.99%

FBDC vs. FDFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBDC has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FDFF's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBDC vs. FDFF - Dividend Comparison

FBDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.88%, more than FDFF's 0.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF	11.88%	5.41%	0.00%	0.00%
FDFF Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF	0.96%	0.86%	0.70%	0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBDC and FDFF in my portfolio?

FBDC and FDFF have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBDC or FDFF?

FBDC has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to FDFF (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBDC dropped -20.60% vs FDFF's -23.06%.

Which ETF is better, FBDC or FDFF?

On 1-year performance, FDFF leads with -2.70% vs -7.42% for FBDC. On fees, FDFF is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FDFF has been the lower-risk option at 4.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FBDC or FDFF?

Over the 1-year period, FDFF has performed better with a -2.70% return vs -7.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBDC or FDFF?

FDFF is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for FBDC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBDC or FDFF?

FBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.88%, compared with 0.96% for FDFF.

What is the main difference between FBDC and FDFF?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for FBDC and 0.50% for FDFF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.