PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXO vs. VFH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXO vs. VFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund (FXO) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXO achieves a 10.50% return, which is significantly higher than VFH's 5.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FXO having a 13.35% annualized return and VFH not far ahead at 13.43%.


FXO

1D
-0.27%
1M
3.00%
6M
9.35%
YTD
10.50%
1Y
20.66%
3Y*
19.71%
5Y*
11.41%
10Y*
13.35%
ALL TIME*
8.54%

VFH

1D
-0.14%
1M
2.24%
6M
7.40%
YTD
5.30%
1Y
13.18%
3Y*
19.66%
5Y*
11.34%
10Y*
13.43%
ALL TIME*
6.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.27M$3.01M$3.46M
$53.46M$73.54M$73.23M

FXO vs. VFH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXO
First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund
10.50%13.59%27.72%9.28%-9.24%37.76%5.95%26.31%-11.72%17.88%
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
5.30%14.91%30.44%14.17%-12.31%35.22%-1.96%31.57%-13.52%19.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FXO and VFH is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007

0.90

The correlation between FXO and VFH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXO vs. VFH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXO
VFH

Financial Services

94.8%
97.0%

Real Estate

4.8%
0.8%

Technology

0.5%
2.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.1%

Industrials

-

0.2%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

FXO
94.8%
VFH
97.0%

Real Estate

FXO
4.8%
VFH
0.8%

Technology

FXO
0.5%
VFH
2.0%

Basic Materials

FXO

-

VFH

-

Communication Services

FXO

-

VFH
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FXO

-

VFH
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

FXO

-

VFH

-

Energy

FXO

-

VFH

-

Healthcare

FXO

-

VFH
0.1%

Industrials

FXO

-

VFH
0.2%

Utilities

FXO

-

VFH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXO vs. VFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FXO
FXO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FXO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FXO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

VFH
VFH Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VFH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFH Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
VFH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFH Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FXO vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund (FXO) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXOVFHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.14

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

0.74

+0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.64

1.93

+2.71

FXO vs. VFH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXO Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is higher than the VFH Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXO and VFH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXO vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXO drawdown since its inception was -71.30%, smaller than the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXO and VFH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXOVFHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.30%

-78.61%

+7.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.72%

-14.75%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.35%

-17.30%

-4.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.80%

-25.66%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.55%

-44.42%

-4.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-1.21%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.01%

-18.42%

+5.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

5.67%

-1.76%

Volatility

FXO vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund (FXO) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) have volatilities of 4.15% and 4.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXOVFHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

4.07%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

11.21%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.64%

15.06%

+0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.71%

19.12%

+2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.05%

22.48%

+1.57%

FXO vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXO has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than VFH's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXO vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison

FXO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than VFH's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXO
First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund
1.99%1.78%1.97%2.98%2.49%1.91%2.60%1.72%2.60%1.62%1.35%1.51%
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
1.67%1.55%1.75%2.08%2.31%1.87%2.21%2.17%2.30%1.53%1.63%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, FXO and VFH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FXO has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to VFH (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXO dropped -71.30% vs VFH's -78.61%.

On 10-year performance, VFH leads with 13.43% vs 13.35% for FXO. On fees, VFH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VFH has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 13.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VFH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for FXO.

FXO has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.67% for VFH.

FXO tracks StrataQuant Financials Index, while VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for FXO and 0.09% for VFH.

FXO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXO and VFH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer